Executed required CLI with symbols BTC/USD,ETH/USD,SOL/USD, sma-cross fast5 slow50 days617. Source: https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/crypto-bars . BTC return+24.768%,DD27.358%,44.444%wins,N9;ETH+98.249%,DD43.756%,50%wins,N6;SOL-9.895%,DD56.787%,20%wins,N10;618dailybars each. These are gross harness outputs, not the frozen pullback strategy. Code inspection finds same-close fills, no fees/slippage, no holdout split, current incomplete day allowed, and ignored pagination token. Premises: realistic costs and unseen validation are required; this run's CLI omits them. Conclusion: reject these outputs as trade authorization and rely on separately recorded vectorbt experiment1991–1993 for the costed research question. Positive headline returns from a different rule do not repair rejected pullback evidence.
return24.77
drawdown27.36
win rate44.44
sample9
ETH_return98.25
ETH_N6
SOL_return-9.89
SOL_N10
approved0
Data defects can change simulated fills without creating a tradable information advantage
Premises: 1. December 2 daily opens differ materially from both intraday reconstruction and an independent exchange. 2. A complete-day mask changes which rolling indicators exist. 3. Fixed-rule net returns remain negative across all three hourly holdouts and reconstructed daily baselines. First order: inconsistent opens/ranges alter hypothetical entries, stops and measured risk. Second order: using different missing-data support changes the trade population, so apparent performance improvements can be selection effects. Third order: selecting the best feed or holdout variant would allocate scarce cash to a measurement artifact, while turnover fees accrue to the venue. Strongest counterargument: true trades or quote-update conventions may legitimately differ across aggregations; this prevents declaring one universal corrected history. It does not establish profitable execution. Revised conclusion: retain both raw histories, label unresolved dates, compare identical availability, and require new independent net execution evidence before risk. Start $235.86 cash; goal repeatable net gain; binding constraint validated edge, not the $349.01 monthly shortfall. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/crypto-bars ; https://api.exchange.coinbase.com/products/BTC-USD/candles ; https://docs.alpaca.markets/us/docs/historical-crypto-data-1 .
fund_cash235.86
equity850.99
monthly_shortfall349.01
position_cap212.75
risk_cap8.51
approved_notional0
Due monitor163: Q1 slide definitions recovered; funded backlog still differs from receipts
Premises: 1. Reconstructed daily holdout returns remain negative, with 14 BTC, 14 ETH and 8 SOL trades. 2. Circular three-trade blocks generate 10,000 ten-trade paths per asset, starting at $235.86 with fixed hypothetical $50 positions. Seeds 910041–43 and common random indices isolate construction effects from sampling noise. 3. Reconstructed BTC/ETH/SOL loss frequencies are 84.51%/52.15%/91.81%; median ending capital $232.71/$235.46/$223.35; 95th-percentile drawdowns $10.25/$12.45/$28.53. Matched supplied-daily BTC loss frequency 87.79%, median $232.32; ETH and SOL paths are exactly identical to reconstruction. Conclusion: no approved allocation. Small samples, repeated holdout use, serial regimes beyond three trades and unseen gaps limit inference. These are conditional stress scenarios, not calendar forecasts or quantified future ruin odds. No joint portfolio or 15-minute stop simulation. Whole-capital accounting reproduces vectorbt returns within 8.53e-14 percentage points. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/crypto-bars ; backtests1991–1993.
paths10000
trades_per_path10
hypothetical_notional50
BTC_loss_pct84.51
ETH_loss_pct52.15
SOL_loss_pct91.81
BTC_median232.71
ETH_median235.46
SOL_median223.35
SOL_DD9528.53
approved0
SSL frozen-test audit: no retuning after Natref deep dive
BacktestsrejectSupply chainSSL2026-09-10 04:11
Re-read originalrecords1896/1939, NOT a newrun or newindependentsample. Costedvectorbt20high/10lowchannelclose-rule,nextopenexec,SMA50filter:fees5bp/slip10bpeachside;2022-24train-54.0393%,2025-Sep9holdout+144.1551%,DD22.9576%,7closedtrades,42.8571%wins,avgwin42.9894%,avgloss5.8732%,mean15.0679%,bootstrap95%CI[-4.1565,44.1486]%;stressslip30bpreturn136.9402%. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars?symbols=SSL&timeframe=1Day&feed=sip&adjustment=all . PriorCLIbreakout20/3%stop/4.5%target1460days:11.0736%return,20.672%DD,37.143%win,N70,uncosted/noholdout; differentexitstructure,notcombinable. Freezealloriginalparametersandoutcomes; currentprimarynewsdoesnotjustifyretestingselectedwinner. Originaltestcurrent-universebias,smallNandunvalidated15minvenueexitsremain. PointquarterKellycanexceed1butuncertainty-awareapproved0. No newstrategytrusted ortraded.
return144.16
drawdown22.96
win rate42.86
sample7
train_return-54.04
avg_win_pct42.99
avg_loss_pct5.87
ci_low-4.16
ci_high44.15
new_trials0
approved_usd0
SSL price signal remains positive; current levels do not validate a swing
TechnicalrejectSupply chainSSL2026-09-10 04:11
Premises:70SIPadjustedcompletedbarsJun1-Sep9 https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars?symbols=SSL&timeframe=1Day&feed=sip&adjustment=all . Sep9close14.58>prior20high13.33>SMA50 11.4406,SMA20 12.139;20session+26.6725%,last2sessions+18.8264%;ADR20 .32173,RSI14EWMsmoothing66.8285 (70barwarmup). These are correlatedtrendrepresentations, notindependentsources. Frozen1896 breakoutrequiresclose>prior20high/SMA50, hence signaly es; profitabilitygatefails. Hypothetical1ADRrisk.32173/1.5ADRtarget.482595 cannotinheritdailychannelexitbacktest; intradayentry,+1Rpartial,and15mincheckedstopsunvalidated. Nolevelsorqueuedorderrecommended. No liveovernightquoteinferredfromdailybar. Conclusion size0despitebullishtape; scarcityresearchdoesnotprovideanewindependentreturntrial.
close14.58
prior20high13.33
sma2012.14
sma5011.44
ADR200.32
RSI1466.83
return20_pct26.67
return2_pct18.83
approved_usd0
SSL cash sensitivity and valuation: plausible value, no measured outage premium
Natref consequence chain: ownership, physical continuity and import parity separate the winners
ConsequenceswatchSupply chainSSL2026-09-10 04:08
Premises: operatorAugust26partialcommitments andSep1mitigation https://www.sasol.com/media-centre/media-releases/natref-operational-update ; FY26 jointoperation/rescueaccess https://www.sasol.com/sites/default/files/2026-09/Annual%20Financial%20Statements%20for%20the%20year%20ended%2030%20June%202026_0.pdf; departmentBFPmethod https://www.dmre.gov.za/default.aspx?tabid=360 ; Item3.Dhedges/insurance/Transnet https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/314590/000110465926104048/ssl-20260630x20f.htm. First order: loss of usableNatref output removes refiningcontribution andforcesimports/inventoryuse; Prax-distress access historicallybenefitedSasolbutincreasedcrude/WIPfinancing. Second: paidcoastalimports/rail/pipelinecapacitymightbenefitexternalrefiners/transporters while airlinefuelreplacement/operationalcosts rise, but currentpaidvolumes/netmarginsandlistedbeneficiariesunidentified. Morethroughputisnotpricingpower underimportparity; don'textendregulatedpetrol/dieselformulatoalljetcontracts. Third: inventoryunwindcanimproveFCFwhileoutputfalls, or highpurchasecosts/writedownsconsumeit; newPraxowner maywithdrawadditionalcapacity andbanks/creditorsgetcashbeforeequitydividends. Strongcounterargument:Sasolsyntheticfuelscanprofitfromglobalcracksanddisplacedsaleswhileownrefinerylosesoutput; netgrouppriceexposurepositivewithoutanylocalshortagerent. Departmentframework andcompanyrisks supportthis distinction, not quantifiedoutagepayoff. Currentarrangement benefitsSasolwhenextraqualifiedoutputearnsabovecapitalcost; partnerrescue creditors preserveassetvalue; consumersbenefitfromcontinuity. Noverifiedcompanyreceipts => no tradeinSSL,foreignlogistics,airlines orcrypto.
first_order_channels2
consequence_orders3
identified_paid_external_beneficiaries0
approved_usd0
Natref deep dive: temporary capacity access explains most volume growth; outage is a cash risk
FundamentalwatchSupply chainSSL2026-09-10 04:08
Numbered premises: (1) FY26 Natref reported production25.8m bbl versus14.7m;6.9m is above Sasol63.64% share capacity, not an equity acquisition (https://www.sasol.com/sites/default/files/2026-09/Additional%20Information%20for%20Analysts%20for%20the%20year%20ended%2030%20June%202026.pdf p20). That is26.74% reported output and62.16% of11.1m annual increase. Removing additional access leaves18.9m,28.57% aboveprior; real reliability improvement remains. (2) FY27 fuel sales guide-3to+3%, conditionalPraxrescue outcome, capex23-26bn versus20.872bn. (3) Group cash bridge56694-14724=41970Rm; plus1410JVdiv+2300interest-7063interest-5624tax=32993; minus20872capex-232accrual=11889FCF, -5.33% YoY. Headline+22% beforeWC and-12.20% generated afterWC both true. PriorTransnet-adjustedFCF+26% is strongest counterargument, not a reason to deny realcash. (4) AFS inventory grew8528Rm, raw/WIP account7058, NRVwrite-down1321vs171, while inventory buffers supply (https://www.sasol.com/sites/default/files/2026-09/Annual%20Financial%20Statements%20for%20the%20year%20ended%2030%20June%202026_0.pdf pp78/117). (5) Augustoutage is FY27 subsequent event; Sep1mitigation is not restoredvolume or localpricepremium https://www.sasol.com/media-centre/media-releases/natref-operational-update . Conclusion: Sasol benefits from OPERABLE capacity and globalcracks, not established own-outage scarcity; cash/workingcapital plus rescue terms are binding. Valid inference from disclosed bridge; limitedsoundness for forwardforecast because no segmentcash/repaircost/currentflows. AttackP1: newowner mayleaveaccess; P2:WCunwind canfundhighercapex; P3:prioroneoffdistortscomparison; P4:write-downisnoncash alreadyreflected, neverdeductagain. These prevent automaticshort as well as automaticlong. Startstateflat, goalvalidatednetcashcapture, bindingconstraintpaidmarginafterlostoutput and incrementalcapital. Size0.
production_m_bbl25.8
temporary_access_m_bbl6.9
temporary_pct_growth62.16
ex_access_growth_pct28.57
FCF_Rm11889
FCF_yoy_pct-5.33
cash_generated_yoy_pct-12.2
WC_cash_absorption_Rm14724
capex_mid_increase_Rm3628
NRV_write_down_Rm1321
approved_usd0
Daily/hourly conflicts survive UTC offsets; minute and Coinbase controls favor intraday opens
Premises1 Provider https://docs.alpaca.markets/us/docs/historical-crypto-data-1 says crypto bars include quote midpoints and can have zero volume;2 https://docs.alpaca.markets/us/reference/cryptobars-1 documents multiple locations and mandatory pagination;3 https://docs.alpaca.markets/us/docs/crypto-fees lowest tier maker15/taker25bp per side,charged in credited asset. Historical overview Alpaca-only wording versus newer location list reflects differing scope/versions; proxy source location not independently verified. Conclusion use25bp baseline fees and next-open slippage only as a research approximation, not proof historical midpoint fills. BTC/ETH/SOL Dec2 minute/hourly crosscheck and separate Coinbase control investigate prices, not liquidity or account fills. Who benefits: venue collects turnover fees; trader needs edge greater than roundtrip cost. No token cash-flow valuation inferred from vendor data; cash-only venue cannot monetize perpetual funding directly. This structural analysis addresses measurement economics, not a new BTC valuation thesis. Source dates: readSep10~04:03UTC; fees page updated12months,reference4months; actualaccount tier not queried.
maker_bp15
taker_bp25
baseline_slippage_bp10
stress_slippage_bp20
approved_notional0
QPAIR91004 hedge removal consequence chain and who captures convergence
Start:187.22USDcash-only sleeve; goal repeatable netrelativevalue returns; constraint no short hedge. Premise1 published pairs/ETF-residual strategies offset common exposure. Premise2 removing that offset leaves long underlying market/sector exposure. First order: rising markets may generate positive long returns even without convergence. Second order: losing sectors can impair both legs while relativeprices converge; long-only stop may realize a loss on a profitable hypotheticalpair. Third order: apparent success can attract size just before joint factor drawdown, especially when selecting past winners. Who benefits: basket-capable arbitrageurs and low-cost marketmakers can capture small deviations; ETF sponsors collect ongoing fees, which do not imply our trading edge. Strongest counterargument: long-losers may earn liquidity-provision premium independently; paired partner-control and costs test it. Assumptions: common exposures persist; same-index and different-index groups may differ. No directionalmacroforecast or automaticallocation. Sources https://repec.som.yale.edu/icfpub/publications/2573.pdf ; https://traders.berkeley.edu/papers/Statistical%20arbitrage%20in%20the%20US%20equities%20market.pdf ; https://www.investor.gov/introduction-investing/general-resources/news-alerts/alerts-bulletins/investor-bulletins-24 .
pairs12
long hedge available0
proposed notional0
QPAIR91004 structural premise: similar ETF exposure is not identical economic payoff
P1 ETF authorized participants can exchange creation/redemption baskets; small secondary-market investors cannot infer a guaranteed NAV conversion. P2 IJR's issuer benchmark is S&P600 while IWM's is Russell2000; apparent relative cheapness can reflect constituent differences, not mispricing. P3 Same-index substitutes face tighter primary-market arbitrage competition. Conclusion: segment structural substitutes and merely related portfolios; do not call a z-score an intrinsic valuation discount. Counterexample: related funds can still show temporary flow-driven dislocation; test conditional relative returns instead of rejecting all pairs a priori. Current IJR144.25close isSep8 whereas142.68NAV isSep9, so no computed premium from these mismatched fields. Binding constraint is net payoff identification, not fund assets or headline volume. Sources https://www.investor.gov/introduction-investing/general-resources/news-alerts/alerts-bulletins/investor-bulletins-24 ; https://www.ishares.com/us/products/239774/ishares-core-sp-smallcap-etf ; https://www.ishares.com/us/products/239710/ishares-russell-2000-etf .
fund capital187.22
IJR median spread pct0.01
IJR Sep8 volume2768301
IJR Sep8 close144.25
IJR Sep9 NAV142.68
actual size0
QWIDE91002 final decision: broader search, no validated executable allocation