Start state: flat with $260 fund cap. Goal state: top three eligible sector ETFs held equally. Binding constraint was RTH-only fractional execution, now cleared. Premises: completed adjusted screen ranked XLK/XLE/XLV first through third and each was above SMA200; XLF alone was the fourth eligible asset; actual aggregate XLE exposure remains below the 25% account cap; all three actual fills passed the per-lot gap stress. Conclusion: hold XLK/XLE/XLV for 1–3 months, do not re-rank until the first October trading run unless a stop fires. Ratchet a stop only after profit to max(SMA200, high20-2ATR); never loosen. The monthly funding deficit and same-day sector headlines have no role in this fixed rule.
Using actual fills and the precommitted stress formula loss=N*[r+(1-r)g+0.005], r=2*ATR/entry and g=max(10%, twice the worst observed adjusted overnight gap), each $86.65 lot remains below 2% of current $998.75 equity ($19.975): XLK about $13.76 at g=12.5136%, XLE about $13.52 at g=11.5864%, XLV about $11.10 at g=10%. Total scenario loss is about $38.38, but the mandate applies the under-2% test per lot. This is a deterministic stress, not a loss ceiling; a larger-than-sampled gap can lose more. Targets imply approximately $15.92/$17.87/$9.21 gross upside and about 5.5R/5.2R/4.1R, using overlapping historical P90 endpoints rather than win probabilities. Source: https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars.
equity998.75
lot86.65
risk_limit_each19.98
XLK_loss13.76
XLE_loss13.52
XLV_loss11.1
joint_loss38.38
13:50 UTC fixed sector screen and verified RTH deployment
Premises:1 Analysis3825 adjusted indicators/targets and observed gaps.2 Fixed equal allocation260/3 and25%account cap249.815.3 Stress explicitly assumes full2ATR stop distance followed by gap g=max(.10,2abs sampleworst), plus.5%notional friction. Formula loss=N*(r+(1-r)*g+.005),r=2ATR/E. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars . With adjustedclose E for illustration, g12.5136125/11.5863927/10%, slot86.66 losses13.792109/13.489460/11.106454 <19.9852 account2%. Equal common ceilingmin(260/3,249.815,(19.9852-.01)/maxlossfraction) rounds86.66. Joint38.388023=3.842%account, not2% aggregate. Target dollar scenarios15.920745/17.872222/9.209198, gross5.539/5.240/4.129R over1-3months; P90 historical60day endpoints1255 overlap, NOT independent winprobability. Counterexample: larger overnight gap can exceed2%; entirelot loss86.66 exceeds2%, so no guaranteed risk cap claimed. Refresh E/capital/exposure and action units before eachRTHorder. This is deterministic stress, not MonteCarlo or backtest; no repeated MC or Kelly override of fixed validated allocation. Prior live15minute exit calibration remains unknown.
equity999.26
slot86.66
risk_ceiling125.51
gap_XLK13.79
gap_XLE13.49
gap_XLV11.11
joint_gap38.39
target_XLK15.92
target_XLE17.87
target_XLV9.21
Action-basis failure chain and unchanged Monday implementation
Premises:1 Analysis3827 paired data proves raw top3XLV/XLF/XLK versus required adjustedXLK/XLE/XLV.2 Issuer calendar confirms Mondayexdate but does not supply amount.3 Own flat and RTHfractional only. Sources https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars ; https://docs.alpaca.markets/us/reference/stockbars ; https://www.ssga.com/library-content/products/fund-data/etfs/us/distribution/SPDR_Dividend_Distribution_Schedule.pdf . First order: unadjusted split creates false negative12m return; second: wrong ranking buysXLF instead ofXLE; third: resulting exposure no longer replicates mandated sector premium. Separate dividend chain: confusing adjustedclose with executablequote creates false price move; then wrong ATR/entry-unit pairing; then mis-set stop/target or needless cash. Fix conditional corporate-action audit, same-basis indicators, current executable entry and verified receipts. Strongest counterargument: vendor adjustments can themselves be wrong; answer compare split continuity and actual action documents, never unconditional halving. Who benefits: broker/fund turnover earns costs, not evidence of investor edge. No automatic trade between04and06UTC because market remains closed; preserve455 at13:50UTC. If next RTH eligible and flat execute, if alreadyfilled hold, if stopfired journal+rerank. Previous missed deployment remains unresolved; reminders do not cure it.
wrong_memberships1
raw_XLE_12m_pct-28.54
adjusted_XLE_12m_pct47.37
planned_total259.98
Distribution mechanics: Monday entry does not capture September payout
Premises:1 Issuer primary schedule accessedSep21 https://www.ssga.com/library-content/products/fund-data/etfs/us/distribution/SPDR_Dividend_Distribution_Schedule.pdf places all11 sector ETFs on Sep21 ex/record andSep23 pay.2 Its glossary says shares bought on exdate do not include latest distribution entitlement.3 Sector-rot ownledger empty; planned purchase Monday RTH. Conclusion: do not add September dividend to expected proceeds of new Monday lots; historical adjusted momentum remains required. Provider raw/all close differences XLK.22,XLE.38,XLV.64 are observed adjustment differences, NOT independently confirmed payouts. Workbook https://www.ssga.com/library-content/products/fund-data/etfs/us/spdr-etf-historical-distributions.xlsx downloaded and parsed as ZIP/XML after missing openpyxl; no September amounts established. Counterexample: other funds might have older entitled shares, but their trade dates/cash receipts cannot be borrowed. Economic chain: distribution reduces fund assets when paid; entitlement and market repricing must be separated from trading alpha. Source is issuer, interested but closest to calendar; provider is independent of issuer for historical bars, not independent confirmation of cash. No valuation/news override and no dividend-capture trade.
exdate2026-09-21
paydate2026-09-23
confirmed_September_amounts0
Adjustment deep dive: raw prices replace XLE with XLF; dividends do not change trio
Question: could corporate-action basis change Monday selection? Premises:1 Same33 series (11 ETFs x raw/split/all) fetched from https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars using identical start/end/SIP.2 Provider https://docs.alpaca.markets/us/reference/stockbars defines all as split+dividend+spin-off and raw as unadjusted.3 Rule requires adjusted returns. Findings: all eligible ranking XLK20.034955%,XLE19.704288%,XLV12.444763%,XLF5.419049%; split-only19.737064/18.000057/11.537557/4.692775%, same ordering. Raw eligible XLV11.537557%,XLF4.692775%,XLK2.275285%,XLE.138153%, replacing XLE with XLF. Raw12m XLK-30.147736/XLE-28.536504 versus all+40.437523/+47.372061: splits create false losses. Eligibility unchanged across bases for all11. Dividend-inclusive minus split-only mean difference XLK.297891pp/XLE1.704231pp/XLV.907206pp; attribution to non-split adjustments, chiefly distributions, not verified individual dividend cash. Counterexample to dividend-driven selection claim: same top3 without dividend adjustments. Valid inference: splits material to membership; dividends material to levels but not today's membership. Soundness limited to same vendor, current vintage, not independent market verification or point-in-time backtest. Stop collecting additional generic adjustment sources: docs plus paired series answer the question; exact dividend amount remains separate unknown.
all_XLK_mean_pct20.03
all_XLE_mean_pct19.7
all_XLV_mean_pct12.44
raw_XLE_mean_pct0.14
raw_XLK_mean_pct2.28
raw_XLF_mean_pct4.69
split_XLE_mean_pct18
comparison_series33
bars_each1332
04UTC all11 signals: XLK XLE XLV, 86.66 each planned
Premises:1 Refreshed3768 selects3aboveSMA despite XLK63day-.843%,XLV21day-4.148%.2 Issuer forecasts are expectations.3 Ownledgerempty and sessionclosed. Sources https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars and issuer URLs in this run fundamental analysis. Conditional mechanisms, not assertions of tonight events: XLK growth disappointment -> cash estimate cuts -> valuation contraction and stop risk; XLE supply restoration or demand destruction -> producer margins fall -> earnings and momentum reverse together; XLV reimbursement/cost disappointment -> estimates cut -> recent weakness can spread to long trend. Counterexample each: cash improvements can sustain trend despite valuation/macro fears. No news veto. Execution chain: failed future RTH run -> fractional slot stays empty -> foregone exposure despite long rule; monitor455 only reminds and cannot cure missing fills. Existing281 collects signals before next04UTC research; market remains closed between runs. PriorSep18 missed deployment remains unresolved; current closure does not excuse it.
own_positions0
XLK_r63_pct-0.84
XLV_r21_pct-4.15
eligible4
Primary issuer cross-check: same forecast multiples, distinct index holdings
Premises:1 Issuer Sep17 snapshots accessedSep21 give XLK FY1PE26.17/Pcashflow28.60/growthestimate36.25%, XLE12.46/8.77/10.87%, XLV20.04/17.71/11.77%.2 These are forecast-sensitive ratios, not independent earnings outcomes.3 Fixed rotation admits no valuation veto. Sources https://www.ssga.com/us/en/intermediary/etfs/state-street-technology-select-sector-spdr-etf-xlk ; https://www.ssga.com/us/en/intermediary/etfs/state-street-energy-select-sector-spdr-etf-xle ; https://www.ssga.com/us/en/intermediary/etfs/state-street-health-care-select-sector-spdr-etf-xlv . XLV fund characteristics60 holdings versus index59 explains prior59 as index count, not proof bad data. Counterexamples: high XLK forecastgrowth can disappoint, cheap XLE PE can reflect peak earnings, defensive XLV can still decline. Provider benefits from assets/fees; snapshots describe its products and are not corroborated profit forecasts. Conclusion retain measured signals, track stops rather than invent cheaper substitutes; no new fundamental change found.
XLK_FY1PE26.17
XLE_FY1PE12.46
XLV_FY1PE20.04
XLV_fund_holdings60
XLV_index_holdings59
02UTC gap sizing at equity999.38; equal slots retained
Premises:1 Refreshed3768 unchanged adjusted series,1331 synchronized returns.2 Fixed equal slots constrained by260fund/249.845position cap.3 Stress assumes gap g=max(.10,2abs historical worst gap), plus.5%friction, after full stop distance r=2ATR/E. Common N=floorcents min(260/3,249.845,(.02*999.38-.01)/max[r+(1-r)*g+.005])=86.66; risk ceiling125.52531 is nonbinding. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars. Historical worst gaps -6.256806/-5.793196/-2.639964%, stressg12.513612/11.586393/10%. Perlot stress13.792109/13.489460/11.106454 below19.9876; joint38.388023=3.841%equity, not guaranteed loss maximum. Total instrument loss86.66 exceeds2%, so gaps unbounded. Basket vol16.089109%,worstday-7.087094%,correlations.238532/.389867/.241683. Selected-today hindsight sample excludes extinct instruments, not unbiased strategy performance. No new information to justify repeated simulation: prior3650 regime/block sensitivity remains19.76–50.20%loss frequencies with staticbrackets, not live execution odds or Kelly inputs. Specific equal-weight mandate supersedes generic Kelly guidance; P90 is a quantile not90%success probability. Targetgrossprofit43.002165 if all targets reached, not expectation.
Premises:1 SIP adjustment=all delivers1332 unique completed bars each throughSep18 after explicit endpoint fallback from403.2 Dec5 split open/priorclose ratios XLK1.004627 XLE.998215 XLY1.000931 XLU1.000235 XLB1.002301 show continuous adjusted series; no manual repairs.3 Fixed average21/63/126/252 return and close>SMA200. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars . Table returns decimals; ATR20 simple mean true range. P90 rolling60-session returns with ending dates in five years through latest completedSep18,1255 observations. Sizes planned only.
symbol|r21|r63|r126|r252|mean|close|SMA200|ATR20|eligible rank|size
XLK|0.032437|-0.008430|0.373015|0.404375|0.200350|189.380000|162.046850|3.140500|1|86.66
XLE|0.011551|0.204635|0.098265|0.473721|0.197043|63.930000|54.987750|1.258000|2|86.66
XLV|-0.041483|0.132069|0.158414|0.248790|0.124448|167.750000|154.588250|2.158500|3|86.66
XLF|-0.028282|0.046241|0.150000|0.048803|0.054190|55.660000|53.263450|0.705500|4|0
XLB|-0.048202|-0.031530|0.055803|0.120216|0.024072|49.760000|49.944450|0.785000|fails|0
XLI|-0.067012|-0.059340|0.040182|0.137616|0.012861|169.300000|170.685250|2.392000|fails|0
XLP|-0.043155|0.000852|0.022880|0.060598|0.010294|82.260000|82.426350|0.885500|fails|0
XLRE|-0.054472|-0.021800|0.030540|0.046910|0.000295|42.180000|42.420400|0.499000|fails|0
XLC|-0.004507|0.015072|-0.014895|-0.055741|-0.015017|110.450000|113.253900|1.601000|fails|0
XLY|-0.063720|-0.050399|0.016236|-0.073585|-0.042867|110.790000|116.321000|1.502000|fails|0
XLU|-0.066362|-0.075878|-0.105067|0.001719|-0.061397|40.800000|43.898750|0.630500|fails|0
Four qualify; XLF excluded rank4; XLB/XLI/XLP/XLRE/XLC/XLY/XLU fail trend. Third-fourth gap7.025715pp. Entire fixed mandate screened; individual US listings, non-US listings and crypto excluded by universe, not claimed statistically screened. Validation complete, no redundant backtest. Dollar exits must use current action-consistent units and actual entry; historical adjusted close is not quote.
universe11
bars_each1332
eligible4
slot86.66
total259.98
rank_spread_pp7.03
Sep21 handoff: fixed long selection, closed session, updated reminder455
Premises:1 Fresh adjusted synchronous returnsJune2021–Sep2026 from https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars .2 Basket selected today, so historical equal-weight diagnostics are selection-conditioned, NOT a strategy backtest or untouched holdout.3 Equity1000cap260 dictates86.66each absent tighterrisk. Python sample1331: annualized dailyvol16.0891%, worstbasketday-7.0871%, paircorrelations.238532/.389867/.241683. Selected ETF worstnegativeopen/priorclose gaps-6.256806/-5.793196/-2.639964%. g=max(.10,2absworstgap),r=2ATR/E; loss=N*(r+(1-r)*g+.005). Common N=floorcents min(260/3,250,19.99/max(lossfraction))=86.66. Stress13.7921/13.4895/11.1065 each<20; joint38.3880. Assumed.5%friction and gaps12.5136/11.5864/10%; arbitrary worse gaps can exceed2%equity, so this is not guaranteed maximum loss. Full premium is not at risk as for options; total loss of each ETF wouldcost86.66. Positive samplecorrelation refutes hedge guarantee. P90 target scenario basketgrossprofit43.0022 is neither expectancy nor probability forecast. Reuse recorded3650 MonteCarlo sensitivity (60kpaths, staticbrackets, recentvsolder sample); no new run since no new marketday and rounding/adjustment vintage supplies no independent evidence. Its19.76–50.20%lossfrequencies are not liveodds or Kelly inputs. No mandate revalidation.
sample1331
annual_vol_pct16.09
worst_day_pct-7.09
corr_K_E0.24
corr_K_V0.39
corr_E_V0.24
slot86.66
stress_K13.79
stress_E13.49
stress_V11.11
joint_stress38.39
target_scenario_profit43
Three-stage bear chains and what actually changed tonight
Premises:1 No own open positions, orders or closes; no held exits to reset.2 Fresh3732 signals: XLK63day-.843% despite252day+40.438%; XLV21day-4.148% despite252day+24.879%; XLE252day+47.372%.3 Issuer valuation observations30978–80 describe expectations, not new realizations. Sources https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars and issuer fund pages in fundamental analysis. XLK strongest bear chain: (1) growth/capex monetization disappoints, (2) cash forecasts and valuation multiples contract, (3) sector momentum can reverse faster than monthly ranking, triggering stop/gap loss. XLE: (1) supply restores or expensive oil reduces demand, (2) producer realized prices/margins/cash fall, (3) cheap-looking forecast PE and recent momentum unwind together. XLV: (1) reimbursement, drug pricing or operating costs disappoint, (2) estimates decline, (3) already-negative1month performance can propagate to trend failure. These are conditional mechanisms, not claims those events happened today. What changed: provider adjusted historical prices and now supplies continuous Dec5 split history; raw Friday prints unchanged, no new completed trading day. Issuer Sep21exdate https://www.ssga.com/library-content/products/fund-data/etfs/us/distribution/SPDR_Dividend_Distribution_Schedule.pdf supports an adjustment mechanism; exactSeptember amounts unconfirmed, do not assert feed difference equals dividend. Pending Monday buyers have no entitlement to this exdate distribution. Headlines on Saudi, yields and summit remain unverified secondary claims and do not move exits. All three stay aboveSMA200, third-fourth gap7.0257pp; no rule veto. Once held: actualstop -> rerank/lesson; profitable -> ratchet max(existing,SMA200,20dayhigh-2ATR); otherwise hold until scheduled monthly review subject exits/horizon. Next02UTC run precedesmarketopen; no action required during intervening closed session.
XLK_r63_pct-0.84
XLV_r21_pct-4.15
eligible4
changed_selection0
Attack planned basket: forecast valuation and cyclicality, no headline veto
Premises:1 Own ledger has no holding, so review concerns prospective XLK/XLE/XLV, not trend-ws XLE.2 Issuer Sep17 snapshots accessedSep21: XLK FY1PE26.17/Pcashflow28.60/estimatedgrowth36.25%; XLE12.46/8.77/10.87%; XLV20.04/17.71/11.77%. Sources https://www.ssga.com/us/en/intermediary/etfs/state-street-technology-select-sector-spdr-etf-xlk ; https://www.ssga.com/us/en/intermediary/etfs/state-street-energy-select-sector-spdr-etf-xle ; https://www.ssga.com/us/en/intermediary/etfs/state-street-health-care-select-sector-spdr-etf-xlv .3 Forward earnings are estimates, multiples not causal timing signals. Strongest XLK bear: high embedded growth can disappoint and compress valuation; counterexample sustained cash growth can support premium. XLE bear: cheap forward multiple can be a peak-earnings trap if realized energy prices fall or costs rise; counterexample sustained profitable scarcity. XLV bear: lower expected growth plus20xforward may not cushion reimbursement/cost/earnings disappointment; counterexample resilient paid demand. Beneficiaries of optimism include existing shareholders; fund issuer earns fees regardless of our timing. No new company cash-flow evidence verified tonight, so none of these conditional hypotheses is a claimed new event. Conclusion maintain fixed selection and evidence-based exits. Scope excludes single names/crypto/non-US substitutions. Soundness limited by estimates and snapshot timing; valid implication is risk awareness, not discretionary rotation.
XLK_forward_PE26.17
XLE_forward_PE12.46
XLV_forward_PE20.04
XLK_cashflow_multiple28.6
XLE_cashflow_multiple8.77
XLV_cashflow_multiple17.71
Sep21 00UTC full11 signals: revised adjustment vintage, same top3
Premises:1 Fresh SIP adjustment=all 1332 unique completed bars per ETF through Sep18.2 Conditional Dec5 2025 issuer split audit now finds continuous adjusted prices; ZERO repairs, unlike previous vintage.3 Fixed mean21/63/126/252 and close>SMA200. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars ; issuer https://www.ssga.com/library-content/assets/pdf/apac/important-information/2025/jp-press-release-20251203.pdf . All returns decimals; size planned not ordered.
symbol|r21|r63|r126|r252|avg|adjusted_close|sma200|atr20|eligible_rank|size
XLK|0.032437|-0.008430|0.373015|0.404375|0.200350|189.380000|162.046850|3.140500|1|86.66
XLE|0.011551|0.204635|0.098265|0.473721|0.197043|63.930000|54.987750|1.258000|2|86.66
XLV|-0.041483|0.132069|0.158414|0.248790|0.124448|167.750000|154.588250|2.158500|3|86.66
XLF|-0.028282|0.046241|0.150000|0.048803|0.054190|55.660000|53.263450|0.705500|4|0
XLB|-0.048202|-0.031530|0.055803|0.120216|0.024072|49.760000|49.944450|0.785000|-|0
XLI|-0.067012|-0.059340|0.040182|0.137616|0.012861|169.300000|170.685250|2.392000|-|0
XLP|-0.043155|0.000852|0.022880|0.060598|0.010294|82.260000|82.426350|0.885500|-|0
XLRE|-0.054472|-0.021800|0.030540|0.046910|0.000295|42.180000|42.420400|0.499000|-|0
XLC|-0.004507|0.015072|-0.014895|-0.055741|-0.015017|110.450000|113.253900|1.601000|-|0
XLY|-0.063720|-0.050399|0.016236|-0.073585|-0.042867|110.790000|116.321000|1.502000|-|0
XLU|-0.066362|-0.075878|-0.105067|0.001719|-0.061397|40.800000|43.898750|0.630500|-|0
Conclusion XLK/XLE/XLV retained; four eligible. Adjusted latest closes189.38/63.93/167.75 differ from raw189.60/64.31/168.39, not fresh price declines. P90 1255 overlapping rolling60day endpoints within trailing5years: XLK 18.371504%,XLE 20.623381%,XLV 10.626815%. Initial stop actual E minus2ATR, target actual E*(1+P90), horizon1–3months; never use adjusted reference as fill. Dollar indicators require same corporate-action units at execution. Strong counterexample: unrecognized future corporate actions could distort values; current independent raw/split/all comparisons narrow that risk. No strategy revalidation.
bars1332
eligible4
slot86.66
total259.98
third_fourth_pp7.03
repairs0
08UTC executable Monday plan; closed-session cash and verified continuity
Premises:1 Primary calendars and issuer pages freshly checkedSep20, observations record dates not outcomes.2 Fixed monthly/stop rotation excludes discretionary macro switches.3 Own ledger empty and ownedmonitors401/382/410 armed, none due. Calendar:
Accessed2026-09-20 primary NYFed calendar: Sep21 SCE Household Spending11:00ET(15UTC); Sep22 Philadelphia nonmanufacturing08:30ET(12:30UTC),Richmond manufacturing10ET(14UTC). Tentative dates; not measured outcomes or surprises. Source https://www.newyorkfed.org/research/calendars/i-sep26.html
Issuer datedAug25 accessedSep20: FY27Q1 resultsSep22 beforemarketopen; call08:30ET. Calendar context only, no sector holding/constituent inference. Source https://news.millerknoll.com/2026-08-25-MillerKnoll-Schedules-First-Quarter-Fiscal-Year-2027-Conference-Call-and-Webcast
Issuer page accessedSep20 listsSep21 date only; releasehour unknown. Broad healthcare context only. Source https://ir.abivax.com/events/event-details/h1-2026-financial-results/
AccessedSep20: Sep22 Jefferson10:20ET speech Discount Window Modernization and Treasury Market Functioning; H6Sep22 13ET. CP13ET andH15 16:15ET bothsessions; H10Sep21 16:15ET. Dates not realized economic outcomes. Source https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/2026-september.htm
AccessedSep20; parsed calendar returned tableheader but no meetingrows. Cannot infer noSep21/22 meetings or drug decisions. Advisory calendar not exhaustive PDUFA calendar; no new FDA catalyst used. Source https://www.fda.gov/advisory-committees/advisory-committee-calendar
Consequence hypotheses, not measured causal coefficients: first stronger householdspending/orders can support demand, second company revenues and input costs change, third profit/discount-rate effects can alter relative sector prices; weak reports reverse demand branch, while inflation can offset revenue gains. Producers benefit from pricing power only if costs do not absorb it; positive aggregate demand need not lift every selected sector. Jefferson liquidity commentary could affect funding expectations, then discount rates, then XLK/XLF valuations; no predicted sign without actual remarks. Neither good nor bad news overrides rule. What changes action: corrected completed bars before initial entry changing rank/SMA eligibility; actualcapital/exposure constraints changing equal sizes; executedstop prompting rerank/lesson; profitableholdings permit upward ratchet. Earnings and incomplete FDA calendar do not justify new single-name positions. Preserve382 Monday16:30UTC and410 Tuesday16:30UTC; H6 at17UTC is after Tuesday review. No duplicated macro monitor needed except later H6 coverage if desired; nextresearchSep21 00UTC precedes all listed events. Historical3650 simulation retained, not repeated or used as live odds.
macro_surveys3
owned_due_monitors0
owned_armed_monitors3
08UTC full sector signal refresh and Monday brackets
Premises:1 Fresh3645 selects XLK/XLE/XLV.2 Current supplied1000 equity260fundcap, own query_trades empty, Sunday market closed.3 Specific mandate requires RTH fractional notional MARKET and equal slots; established premium is not re-tested. Conclusion retain armed monitor401 MondaySep21 13:50UTC and382/410; no orders or exits now. N=floorcents min(cap/3,.25equity,(.02equity-.01)/max_i[r+(1-r)*g+.005]),r=2ATR/E,g=max(.10,2abs worst negative historical gap). N86.66 each259.98; stress13.80/13.49/11.11 dollars,joint38.39, individually below20 under specified scenario only. Unbounded worse gap can exceed20; no guarantee. Lastclose illustrative stop/target: XLK183.311/224.414716;XLE61.78055/77.575833;XLV164.05906/186.287581. At actualentry E use stop E-2ATR (3.1445/1.264725/2.16547), target E*(1+P90) with P90 .183621922/.206279467/.106286482,1255 overlapping60day windows;1–3months. Gross upside15.91/17.88/9.21 versus ordinary stop2.87/3.41/2.23; not expected values. Before EACH eligible RTH placement refresh equity/cap/cash/ownlots/allfund aggregate exposure/quotes/completed bars; supplied otherfund XLE64.63queue+86.66=151.29<250, fresh aggregate ledger still required then. Verify fill and brackets, not reminder alone. Once profitable ratchet max(existing,SMA200,high20-2ATR); stop triggers rerank and lesson, otherwise fixed monthly cadence. Collector281 active27runs, remote02:16 END11/11 exit0 verified; nextSep21 02:16,no replacement needed. No external headline, funding shortfall, simulation probability or generic3R/Kelly rule overrides fixed mandate. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars . Remaining gaps: precise15minexit calibration, future corporate actions and cause of missedSep18execution; present closed-session block does not erase earlier miss.
slot86.66
total259.98
XLK_stress13.8
XLE_stress13.49
XLV_stress11.11
joint_stress38.39
ordinary_stop_total8.51
target_profit_total43
orders0
06UTC 60000-path sample and block sensitivity; not live exit odds
Question: how much do static-bracket exit estimates change with sample and serial dependence? Premises:1 Current fixed basket and brackets from3645.2 Historical synchronous OHLC/priorclose ratios preserve same-day cross-sector dependence.3 Resample consecutive blocks1/5/20days separately from1152 pre2026 and179 recent2026 sessions,10000 paths per case,60 sessions,seed92006,86.66 each,6bp/side assumed friction. No fitted parameter selected. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars. Method stop first for ambiguous same-day dual touch; gap stop at worse opening price; target at fixed target; remaining mark at60-day close. Static current brackets; stop first on same-day dual touch; opening gap stop at worse open; no ratchet, monthly rerank or 15min checks; adjusted OHLC not executable prices; chosen current basket selection bias; 6bp per side costs assumed; no calibrated odds or Kelly sizing. Full case figures observations30444–49. Pre2026 target frequencies XLK12.96–17.29%,XLE11.17–15.56%,XLV13.94–16.61%;2026 XLK20.60–26.17%,XLE32.97–39.15%,XLV20.50–23.43%. Basket loss frequency48.39–50.20% versus19.76–22.72%; modeled mean dollar PnL2.796–3.655 versus9.291–9.632. P05 dollar outcomes roughly-9.89 to-8.97 do NOT bound loss. Conclusion sample choice materially dominates implied success odds, so no empirical Kelly input or sizing/target override. Ratchets/monthly replacement and15minute monitoring omitted deliberately to isolate model sensitivity; not execution backtest, not validated premium test, and not live probabilities. Counterexample crisis correlations and gaps outside observed sample defeat benign recent results. Source was already observed;2026 is a comparison segment, not independent OOS.
paths_per_case10000
cases6
horizon_sessions60
seed92006
pre_mean_min2.8
pre_mean_max3.66
recent_mean_min9.29
recent_mean_max9.63
pre_loss_pct_min48.39
pre_loss_pct_max50.2
recent_loss_pct_min19.76
recent_loss_pct_max22.72
06UTC correlation regime and forward-period gap calibration
Premises:1 Fresh split-normalized adjusted SIP daily bars, source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars .2 Evaluate current XLK/XLE/XLV equal basket, not historical rotating holdings.3 Estimate1% gap thresholds only on2021-06-02 through2025-12-31 and count breaches in2026-01-02 throughSep18. Pair correlations pre2026 XLK/XLE .315635,XLK/XLV .500392,XLE/XLV .293787;2026 -.247776,-.158572,-.078192. Equal daily-return basket annualized volatility16.7368% versus11.0104%; worst synchronized basket gap-3.322667% versus-.954476%. Per-symbol threshold/test: {"XLK":{"pre2026_gap_q01_pct":-2.5947445082801974,"test_breaches":2,"test_n":179,"test_breach_rate_pct":1.1173184357541899},"XLE":{"pre2026_gap_q01_pct":-3.1902366689284984,"test_breaches":4,"test_n":179,"test_breach_rate_pct":2.2346368715083798},"XLV":{"pre2026_gap_q01_pct":-1.3698510638297818,"test_breaches":3,"test_n":179,"test_breach_rate_pct":1.675977653631285}}. Conclusion recent negative correlation reduces measured basket variance, but XLE gap tail worsened: worst pre2026 -4.952927% versus2026 -5.792734%. Do not lower stress sizing from recent diversification. Validity direct historical comparison; soundness limited by small179-day recent sample, current-winner selection, adjusted feed, and observed data vintage. This chronological threshold check is not an untouched strategy holdout; no return/win-rate claim or revalidation of established premium. Would revise diagnostic with new independent completed observations, not macro headlines. All figures stored30442–43/30450.