Premises:1 explicit fractional RTH rule means overnight stops wait;2 earlier3293 measured2020 first30min envelope g EEM.125794155019/QQQ.109666233203/IWM.138906519177 across41sessions plus daily history; these g carried, not remeasured06UTC;3 freshATR/close and sizes from3298. At actualE let r=2ATR/E; modeled loss=N*[r+(1-r)*2g+.005]. 50bp cost allowance and double-envelope multiplier are stress assumptions, not probability estimates. Current89.95/103.11/83.46 yields perlot24.998290/24.999049/24.999609, all below3%equity25.4976; total74.996948=8.824001%equity. N=floor cents min(cap/3,25%equity,25/stress_fraction). Currentcap407.96 gives slot135.9867, risk limits bind; total276.52, residual131.44. Single envelope joint41.634295(4.898613%); triple envelope108.359602(12.749388%), perlot35.991065/36.044304/36.324232 breaches3%. Full default could lose invested276.52: no universal gap-loss guarantee. First order overnight shock crossesstop; second order unavailable fractionalexit waits for RTH plus15min checking and possible liquidity gaps; third order correlated ETFs can lose together and shrink all subsequent caps. Brokers/liquidityproviders receive costs; manager must not turn costs/fundingneed into expectedreturn. Strongest counterargument: double2020 stress arbitrary and omits2008/novelhalts, ordinary historical risk model cannot certify it. Response explicitly carry assumption, maintain strict modeledheadroom and fresh sizing; do not shrink/enlarge based on funding pressure or bootstrap. Reference aggregate normal-stop loss6.889041 and targetgain37.021583 before costs; horizon1–3months, P90 target is not90%success. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars ; live constraints supplied context.
cap407.96
notional276.52
residual131.44
stress_joint75
stress_equity_pct8.82
single_joint41.63
triple_joint108.36
normal_stop_loss6.89
target_gain37.02
risk_budget_perlot25
strict_limit25.5
Long annual momentum with uneven short-term trend strength
Premises:1 completed signals3298 use fixed annual ranks plus SMA200 filter;2 current distance aboveSMA EEM7.880031%,QQQ8.420543%,IWM4.436092%;3 twenty-session returns EEM+1.210104%,QQQ+.117305%,IWM-5.150699%, currentATR/price1.424675/1.160406/1.158077%. Conclusion IWM has weakest short-horizon path while remaining rank3 at annual+21.006444%; this is not broken eligibility or a new RSI/short-momentum veto. Annual/200day filters overlap trend information; combining them does not imply independent confirmation. Last60 EEM/QQQcorr.832760 indicates shared risk despite different geography. Flat initial allocation remains EEM/QQQ/IWM; after entry review actualR/horizon and profit-onlyratchet max(existing,SMA200,high20-2ATR), never loosen. No calibrated causal attribution to macro headlines. Counterexample short fall can become persistent trend reversal; stop and scheduled review implement response instead of ad hoc rule change. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars .
EEM_aboveSMA_pct7.88
QQQ_aboveSMA_pct8.42
IWM_aboveSMA_pct4.44
EEM_20d_pct1.21
QQQ_20d_pct0.12
IWM_20d_pct-5.15
EEM_QQQ_corr600.83
Paired block Monte Carlo: uncertainty in historical tail-risk estimates
Premises:1 statistical risk audit uses428daily return vectors2025-01-02–Sep17 2026 for current89.95/103.11/83.46 notionals;2 resample vectors jointly to preserve contemporaneous cross-asset dependence;3 circular blocks5sessions retain short clusters, 10000replicates, seed9180601. Per replicate sample428days, calculate empirical95% expected-shortfall tail mean,99%loss quantile and mean of frozen threshold-exceedance indicators. Results originalES95=7.609460USD, percentile95% bootstrap interval[5.947080,9.492035]; VaR99=9.368118 interval[6.596389,13.503072]; threshold coverage exceedance.934579% interval[0,2.102804]%. These are Monte Carlo uncertainty intervals for historical daily mark-risk estimates, NOT prospective loss limits, exit odds, independent OOS strategy returns or a Kelly estimate. Resampling observations already inspected and choosing current symbols retrospectively means no new edge evidence. Blocks cannot create novel shocks; 428days and ~22tail observations leave material uncertainty. Circular joins approximate, block length unoptimized; no claim calibrated CI coverage. No repeat static stop/target bootstrap. Decision preserve mandate and earlier crisis stress, do not enlarge sizes because threshold count resembles1%. Costs and actual RTH stop execution absent from return sample; 50bp only in separate stress. Counterexample prolonged halt/new gap is outside bootstrap support. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars ; quant.py/quant_results.json.
replicates10000
block_sessions5
sample428
ES957.61
ES_CI_low5.95
ES_CI_high9.49
VaR_CI_low6.6
VaR_CI_high13.5
coverage_CI_high_pct2.1
seed9180601
Chronological risk-model audit: dependence and 2025–26 threshold coverage
Premises:1 current EEM/QQQ/IWM sizes89.95/103.11/83.46 determine fixed dollar daily return exposure;2 aligned adjusted close returns2016–Sep17 2026;3 model decay.94 fixed before this computation, standardized loss99th percentile estimated only2016–2024 after252warmup observations. Test2025-01-02–2026-09-17,428days, training2263days. Prior-day EWMA squared return forecasts next-day scale; test data update volatility only after realization; threshold multiplier3.015193607. Four exceedances/428=.934579%, latest next-day threshold8.343642USD. This is chronological risk calibration, NOT independent OOS strategy validation: todays symbols and weights chosen with hindsight, prior runs already saw historical data, no selection/rebalancing/exits/fees modeled. No tuning sweep or gate imposed. Pair correlations EEM-QQQ/EEM-IWM/QQQ-IWM train.719423/.689657/.756580; test.772195/.682891/.802395; last60.832760/.634451/.711276. Downside189days conditional correlations.578614/.393634/.642452 subject to selection conditioning. Test actual joint daily SD3.530578 versus independence2.239607; ignoring dependence understates dispersion. Historical test worst dollar daily loss15.128603 Apr4 2025, empiricalVaR99 9.368118, ES95 7.609460. Dollar returns assume daily constant exposure for a risk lens, not buy-and-hold NAV. Valid conclusion: retain dependence-aware stress sizing, not per-lot loss interpreted as book loss. Soundness limits oneprovider, revised history, daily closes miss exit delays/tails; no confidence that99% of future losses stay below threshold. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars . Reproducible quant.py and quant_results.json.
training2263
test428
exceedances4
exceedance_pct0.93
SD_joint3.53
SD_independent2.24
VaR999.37
ES957.61
worst_daily_loss15.13
latest_threshold8.34
06UTC execution decision: resized long allocation awaits regular session
Premises:1) technical3296 confirms initialXLE/XLK/XLV ranks fromSep17 completed SIP adjusted bars https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars .2) Simulation3300 gives common106.62 conditional slots,319.86 total,20.11 residual within339.97 cap and stress16.6522/16.9876/13.7741<16.9984 per lot.3)Market closed in suppliedSep18 context; mandatory fractional notional market orders requireRTH.4)query_trades sector-rot empty, no own closed trade awaitinglesson. Conclusion: cash until next scheduled RTH13:50UTC is execution constraint; deploy if refreshed eligible/flat state. Monitor374 replaces371. Monitor analysis range3296–3299 omitted3300; use3300 for full sizing and simulation. Valid inference from rules, conditional soundness: revised bars,equity or entry can change ranks/sizes; stress is not a maximum loss guarantee. No fundamental/news veto or repeated strategy backtest; validated mandate takes precedence over generic per-run backtest/Kelly directives. Who benefits: fund receives momentum exposure, venue execution flow. Consequences:1)closed-session cash misses price moves;2)outages can prolong underdeployment;3)compact collector and explicit RTH reminder make gap visible but cannot execute orders. New collector locally1551bytes END11/11 replaces truncated stale-size266. No scheduled script places trades. Funding shortfall excluded from all figures.
orders0
slot106.62
planned_deployment319.86
residual_cash20.11
monitor374
R91806 tail premise audit: scenario odds are not calibrated trade odds
Premises: 1. Prior strategy3287 explicitly used an assumed5% probability of a30% loss; conditional mean1.4467783586% gives mixture-.12556055933%, breakevenq4.60072044%. 2. No measured event series supported5%. Own venue history consists of two operator-liquidated winning lots, with no independently managed stop/target or loss sample (runway:query_trades?fund=supply). 3. Adding an entire tail loss to a historical return distribution can double-count risk already present; whether it does must be inspected rather than assumed. Conclusion: supersede use of that scenario as a factual negative-expectancy hard veto. Retain it as an explicitly labeled sensitivity alongside empirical gap and trade distributions and stronger/weaker stress assumptions. Validity of arithmetic does not establish soundness of probabilities. This is a model correction, not authorization to chase TEN: frozen52.81/45.41/55.36 still yields only.31453R. Bar source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars . New panel data fetched2016-Sep17 with held-out calendar windows, results pending.
assumed_tail_probability_pct5
assumed_tail_loss_pct30
conditional_mean_pct1.45
scenario_mean_pct-0.13
breakeven_tail_pct4.6
live_sample2
unmanaged_exits2
New cap: equal106.62 slots under delayed-exit stress; Monte Carlo sensitivity
Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars. Premises: equity849.92, cap339.97, strict2% loss ceiling16.9984; equal-weight unconstrained slots113.3233 exceed ceiling for XLE/XLK under existing model. Loss=N*[r+(1-r)*g+.005],r=2ATR/E,g=max(.10,2*worst negative historical open/previous close). g=.115854679/.125185405/.10. Use common slot floor cents min(cap/3,.25equity,(.02equity-.01)/max(stress fractions))=106.62. Stress losses16.652208/16.987640/13.774069, joint47.413917; deployment319.86,residual20.11. Not a bound: larger gaps and loss-to-zero106.62 per lot can exceed2%; refreshed equity/fills mandatory. Counterexample prevents claiming guaranteed protection. Equal weights retained, no Kelly change. Recent252-session joint circular5-day bootstrap10000 paths,seed91806,60sessions; selected ex post; fixed initial stops and P90 targets, first close crossing exit with50bp adverse exit charge, all survivors liquidated day60; no entry charge, intraday highs/lows or profit ratchet. Results {"paths":10000,"seed":91806,"history_sessions":252,"horizon":60,"block":5,"basket_p05_p50_p95":[-13.761056414003983,12.957375339944516,38.10545280256284],"negative_fraction":0.1903,"per_symbol":{"XLE":{"stop_fraction":0.388,"target_fraction":0.2332,"neither_fraction":0.3788,"p05_p50_p95":[-6.375357170581709,6.312452718414754,22.81350421328447]},"XLK":{"stop_fraction":0.5787,"target_fraction":0.249,"neither_fraction":0.1723,"p05_p50_p95":[-6.631493072416815,-4.243749870200858,20.839633354309434]},"XLV":{"stop_fraction":0.4614,"target_fraction":0.3066,"neither_fraction":0.232,"p05_p50_p95":[-4.501909204275528,0.3809418349380722,12.450141349553459]}}}. These are model-conditional crossing frequencies, not live exit probabilities or strategy backtest; close-only monitoring can miss touches, current regime drifts may not persist, and fixed stops omit mandate ratchet. No edge revalidation and no simulation-based sizing override.
slot106.62
deployment319.86
residual20.11
stress_xle16.65
stress_xlk16.99
stress_xlv13.77
joint_stress47.41
mc_paths10000
mc_p05-13.76
mc_median12.96
mc_p9538.11
mc_negative_pct19.03
Chronological gap-tail diagnostic; no repeat test of rotation premium
Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars. Retrospective chronological split: June2021–Dec2024 902 gaps/ETF, Jan2025–Sep17 2026 428 gaps/ETF. Freeze pre2025 stress max(10%,2*abs(worst gap)); XLE10%,XLK12.51854%,XLV10%. Later sample zero breaches each, but worst XLE increased4.952927% to5.792734%,XLV1.975372% to2.644903%; XLK decreased6.259270% to4.795771%. Full figures {"XLE":{"train_n":902,"test_n":428,"train_min":-0.049529267294310286,"test_min":-0.0579273396952954,"frozen_stress":0.1,"breaches":0,"test_p01":-0.03611185070436171},"XLK":{"train_n":902,"test_n":428,"train_min":-0.06259270246217741,"test_min":-0.04795771263815474,"frozen_stress":0.12518540492435482,"breaches":0,"test_p01":-0.033533697766059266},"XLV":{"train_n":902,"test_n":428,"train_min":-0.01975371985633656,"test_min":-0.02644902894279455,"frozen_stress":0.1,"breaches":0,"test_p01":-0.014740617206684072}}. Premises: gaps are open/previous adjusted close, so observed samples omit stop-to-next-open intraday paths and unseen disasters; ETF basket selected today, historic adjustments current-vintage. Conclusion: no observed breach is not a loss guarantee and cannot establish live winrate. This is an out-of-time model diagnostic, not independently unseen strategy OOS validation; no parameter sweep or refit to authorize trading. Maintain full-sample established stress at entry and fixed-rule equal weights.
train_gaps902
later_gaps428
breaches_each0
xle_later_worst_pct-5.79
xlk_later_worst_pct-4.8
xlv_later_worst_pct-2.64
06UTC nine completed signals and reduced-cap initial complement
Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars. Premises:1)7/11 close aboveSMA200 but only3/11 positive21-session returns; XLC positive21 failsSMA.2)Selected XLE/XLK/XLV means20.010555/19.528247/13.276404%; nextXLF5.353345%,selection margin7.923059pp.3)XLV21-day-.542037% does not invalidate its mean or SMA eligibility.4)SMA distances16.776477/16.085954/8.836090%. Conclusion: broad recent weakness can coexist with longer relative-strength leadership; no additional all-horizons-positive gate. Pearson60-session correlations XLE/XLK-.208295,XLE/XLV-.034137,XLK/XLV-.466185;252-session-.179830/-.040232/-.107243 versus prior full-history+.238174/+.241805/+.389758. Counterexample: correlations can reverse in a crash, so no risk-cap expansion. Current selected basket is ex post, not a historical rotation portfolio; differences are descriptive, not proof of hedge effectiveness.
above_sma7
positive213
selection_margin_pp7.92
corr60_energy_tech-0.21
corr60_energy_health-0.03
corr60_tech_health-0.47
06UTC full sector signal table and equal-weight gap-constrained allocation
Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars?timeframe=1Day&feed=sip&adjustment=all&start=2021-06-01T00:00:00Z&end=2026-09-17T23:59:59Z ; documentation https://docs.alpaca.markets/us/reference/stockbars . All11 have1331 unique completed daily sessions and OHLC checks pass. Mean adjusted21/63/126/252-session returns; SMA200 includes latest close; ATR20 arithmetic mean true range. Table columns symbol,r21%,r63%,r126%,r252%,mean%,close,SMA200,ATR20,eligible-rank,planned$: [["XLE",1.25628,18.79145,11.86676,48.12773,20.01056,64.48,55.2166,1.2882249999999995,1,106.62],["XLK",1.31451,1.33635,36.64172,38.8204,19.52825,188.06,162.00065,3.1324999999999976,2,106.62],["XLV",-0.54204,12.5025,15.71047,25.43469,13.2764,168.81,155.10479999999998,2.268469999999996,3,106.62],["XLF",-3.38866,3.75046,15.09784,5.95374,5.35334,55.88,53.43345,0.7200950000000009,4,0],["XLB",-2.06643,-2.16091,5.44812,13.90386,3.78116,50.71,50.144,0.7967749999999991,5,0],["XLP",-2.44216,0.46931,2.30364,7.57634,1.97678,83.49,82.94265000000001,0.9342600000000004,6,0],["XLRE",-3.78669,-1.49117,3.76994,5.63346,1.03138,42.94,42.7645,0.5042350000000002,7,0],["XLI",-7.93158,-5.66533,2.86045,12.7485,0.50301,169.01,171.0458,2.4502499999999983,null,0],["XLC",1.69261,3.1491,-0.57522,-4.01538,0.06278,112.35,113.6426,1.5849999999999995,null,0],["XLY",-4.27123,-3.35763,1.1441,-7.2986,-3.44584,111.39,116.60995000000001,1.5609999999999986,null,0],["XLU",-5.29305,-5.63603,-9.58577,1.85683,-4.66451,41.69,44.23335,0.6305299999999991,null,0]]. P90 computed from1254 overlapping60-session adjusted returns ending within last5years: XLE20.653340%,XLK18.369738%,XLV10.632192%. Close-based stop/target: XLE61.90355/77.79727;XLK181.795/222.60613;XLV164.27306/186.75820. Recompute from actual entry E: E-2ATR and E*(1+P90). Horizon1–3months. Initial deployment then freeze selections until first monthly trading run or stop; profitable ratchet max(existing,SMA200,high20-2ATR), never loosen. New cap339.97 replaces118.99; equal106.62 slots reflect risk ceiling. No new strategy validation.
eligible7
selected3
slot106.62
deployment319.86
residual_cash20.11
fund_cap339.97
equity849.92
September18 closed-session decision and executable RTH handoff
Premises:1 technical3292 selects EEM/QQQ/IWM with Core retired/flat/noqueued orders;2 current ownledger empty, cap560.95/equity849.92/maxposition212.48;3 explicit mandate requires fractional NOTIONAL MARKET in regularsession; supplied04:13UTC marketclosed, nextopen13:30UTC, nexttradingrun13:50UTC;4 risk3293 permits conditional EEM89.95/QQQ103.11/IWM83.46=276.52, modeled each~25<25.4976. Conclusion no order now; monitor372 directs refreshed eligible deployment at13:50UTC,373 next06UTC research. Monitors353/364 reconciled as missed,327primary report reviewed. No queued limit workaround or lowercrypto substitute. Cash is session constrained now; missedRTH exposure remains an operational mandate gap from reported auth failures, not a bearish signal. After deployment residual284.43 risk constrained. Reference EEM E66.91 stop65.0035 target74.083354 gain10.720899%=3.7626R; QQQ E716.92 stop700.28164 target832.843072 gain16.169597%=6.9672R; IWM E285.43 stop278.819 target322.042957 gain12.827298%=5.5382R. All1–3months; actualentry resets formula levels. Profit-onlyratchet max(existing,SMA200,high20-2ATR); neverloosen. Recompute every lot after earlierfills; freeze actualfills and verify receipts. Startflat,goalinitalcomplement,binding session and gaprisk. Sound only conditional on data/currentstate/model: longerhalt or novelgap can exceed scenario; P90 not90%success. Fundingneed350.08 doesnotchange sizing. Brokers/liquidityproviders earn costs. Consequences:missed session delays exposure; correlated equity shocks can hit all3; joint~75=8.823%equity must not be described as3%bookrisk. EmpireSep15 activity7.6/orders2/pricespaid63.1 andreceived28.1 context only, no macro veto. No new backtest per specific validated mandate, no staticbootstrap or fabricatedKelly. No ownclosed trades; trade11EEM belongsCore trend, not thisfund. Sources https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/crypto-bars https://www.newyorkfed.org/survey/empire/empiresurvey_overview ; supplied venuecontext. No collector needed before next06UTC review: no new completed daily session by then; reminders persisted.
orders0
prospective_notional276.52
cap560.95
modeled_joint_loss75
reference_target_gain37.02
reference_stop_loss6.89
Execution decision: long signals, closed-session block, RTH handoff
Premises:1) Sep17 completed adjusted sector returns select XLE20.01056%,XLK19.52825%,XLV13.27640% average with each close>SMA200 (3289).2) Three $39.66 slots fit118.99 fund and212.48 position caps; explicit gap stress passes<16.9984 each(3290).3) User-supplied current session closed at04:13UTC; next open13:30UTC; fund rule mandates fractional notional market orders only RTH.4) Own query_trades empty and no own due monitors; other funds' monitors and EEM close belong to other managers. Conclusion: preserve actionable long allocation, no invalid overnight market or whole-share limit order; monitor371 prompts first scheduled RTH13:50 deployment. This is a temporary execution constraint, not bearish cash choice. Validity: premises imply eligible long deployment when RTH available. Soundness limits/counterexamples: revised corporate actions or bars can alter ranks; current equity/cash can change; gap larger than stress defeats risk estimate; monitor is not an order and requires future healthy manager run. Recheck before fills. Prior belief is mandated published relative-strength premium; no discretionary news hurdle or per-run validation. Fundamental filings/valuation not selection variables and not newly researched. Who benefits: fund captures broad sector persistence; venue earns execution fees. Consequences:1) market-closed cash misses interim moves;2) prolonged automation failure would turn temporary block into exposure shortfall;3) monitor and daily recorded collector make gap visible but cannot guarantee execution. All return claims source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars?timeframe=1Day&feed=sip&adjustment=all . Monthly funding need does not enter sizes or targets.
planned_deployment118.98
residual_cash0.01
orders0
monitor371
September18 delayed fractional exit stress and reference payoff
Premises:1 daily2016–Sep17 2026 history misses2008;2 fresh15Min SIP adjustment=all crisis2020-02-18–04-15,41sessions/82bars perasset at09:30/09:45;3 g=max(daily adverse open gap, adverse first TWO RTH15min lows relative prior close), expanding prior3115 first15low/09:45open envelope to cover first30min;4 model loss=N*[r+(1-r)*2g+.005],r=2ATR/E,50bp friction assumption. Selected lots [{"symbol":"QQQ","g":0.10966623320329438,"size":103.11,"stress":24.999049024169075,"stop":700.2816399999999,"target":832.8430715665305,"P90":16.169596547248037,"R":6.967217416051264,"normal":2.39298847793338,"gain":16.67247099986745},{"symbol":"IWM","g":0.13890651917671604,"size":83.46,"stress":24.999608792011877,"stop":278.819,"target":322.0429565001183,"P90":12.827297936488211,"R":5.5381873393008965,"normal":1.9330626072942614,"gain":10.705662857793062},{"symbol":"EEM","g":0.12579415501905977,"size":89.95,"stress":24.99829032289767,"stop":65.0035,"target":74.08335366644958,"P90":10.720899217530388,"R":3.7625773230787214,"normal":2.5629902107308324,"gain":9.643448846168583}]. Worst intraday lows allMar16 2020 09:45bar. Sizes floor cents min(cap/3,25%equity,25/model fraction); $25 budget leaves~$0.50 versus strict3%equity25.4976. Roughly equal risk-constrained notionals276.52, remainder284.43 cannot be deployed to these3 under same stress, not a signal veto. Combinedstress74.99695=8.823%equity, normalstop6.88904,targetgain37.02158 beforecosts. Daily-open-only preliminary sizes117.35/119.10/97.77 superseded. This is sizing analysis, no strategy backtest or calibrated live odds/Kelly. Counterexample larger gap/halt/delayed fill exceeds3%; lows not executable quotes. No guaranteed3% ceiling. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars .
Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars. Pearson daily correlations over June2021–Sep17 2026: energy/tech.238174,energy/health.241805,tech/health.389758. All positive; sector diversification does not remove equity-market exposure. P90 targets are unconditional historical60-session quantiles with overlapping samples, not90% success probabilities. Gross target/risk ratios at last close approx5.17/5.51/3.96. No own trade history: realized winrate, slippage and conditional expected payoff unknown. Published premium is accepted per mandate; correlations and bootstrap describe exposure only.
daily_sample1330
rolling60_sample1254
xle_xlk_corr0.24
xle_xlv_corr0.24
xlk_xlv_corr0.39
xle_target_pct20.65
xlk_target_pct18.37
xlv_target_pct10.63
Delayed fractional exits: stress sizing and bootstrap limitations
Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars SIP adjustment all. $39.66 per lot. Stress assumes stop distance r=2ATR/E followed by gap g=max(10%,2*largest observed negative open/previous close gap) plus0.5% execution cost: loss=N*[r+(1-r)*g+.005]. XLE worstgap5.792734% Apr8 2026,g11.585468%;XLK6.259270% Aug5 2024,g12.518540%;XLV2.644903% Apr7 2025,g10%. Losses6.194209/6.318982/5.123612 all<2%equity16.9984. Joint17.636803=2.075113%equity. This stress is not a bound: arbitrarily large gaps can exceed2%; loss-to-zero perlot39.66. Recompute at entry. Diagnostic5000 joint60-session paths from circular5-day blocks of1330 daily returns, seed918, no stops/costs, selected basket ex post: dollarP5/median/P95=-9.66645/+5.62718/+20.48811,26.64%negative. Not live exit odds/expectancy, no out-of-sample edge claim, no Kelly sizing inference. Specific fixed equal-weight mandate controls sizing; no backtest.
1. Live Supply ledger is flat with no queued orders; eleven armed monitors, zero due. Existing370 schedules06UTC receipt/evidence check. 2. Read notes then observations then analyses and latest lessons. Analyses3284–87 were completed immediately before this run; Sep17 TEN52.81 with frozen45.41stop/55.36target yields recorded net0.31452696R vs required3R, entry ceiling47.74447287. These are retained calculations, not a new quote or new test. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars ; dated issuer economics https://www.tenn.gr/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/tenn091026.pdf ; annual risk source https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1166663/000119312526144027/d49235d20f.htm . 3. Retained3214 closed knownholdout1.924%N11/stress-.293%; assumed5% probability of-30% gap gives-.12556055933% expected/trade and zero longKelly. Assumed odds are not empirical. Other recorded setups remain unqualified under3287. 4. Job265 has no remote output yet; do not duplicate recently installed work or claim coverage. Conclusion preserve170.20cash and370 rather than retune. Valid conditional on retained evidence; soundness limited by missing fresh executable quotes/current fixtures, selected holdout and assumed tails. A qualifying limit price alone would not repair expected-value evidence. No new source collection, backtest or simulation claimed. Binding constraint remains defended executable payoff, not cash affordability. Unread ALM filing remains a research gap for next run.
Numbered premises: 1. Ownledger0open0queued,170.20cash;10armed0due monitors. Two operator-liquidated wins cannot estimate loss/Kelly. 2. TEN fresh52.81 only.31453R against frozen45.41/55.36; new issuer evidence does not defend a higher target. 3. Retain backtest3214 train19.191% N22 DD49.047% win36.36%; closed knownholdout1.924% N11,stress-.293%; marked16.577 includesopenpaper and is not closedreturn. LPG2638 train10.2509% N31 butstress-8.328%; closedholdout21.7364% N12 vs35.7496% marked13, no quote/overnight or smallwhole-share partial-exit validation. BWLP priornegative training-17.147%N10; FRO/STNG prior audits remain unqualified, CLI2990/2943 are different policies and not replacements. 4. Retained assumedtail mixture (1-q)*1.4467783586%-q*30%,q5%, gives-.12556055933% expectedtrade, breakevenq4.60072%; assumptions not empirical event odds. Long halfKelly thereforezero under this scenario; even conditional quarterprobe21.248USD belowoneTENshare52.81. One-share30%gap15.843=1.8641%account passes account risk but not expectancy; cap170.20 doesn't create edge. Conclusion no order, selectedset has no validated asymmetric executable payoff. Valid conditional inference; soundness limited by knownholdout selection, assumedtails, missingcurrent paidfixtures. Evidence to change: documented revised cash/NAV target, fresh qualifiedprice plus independent executable edge and sizing. No retune for funding shortfall. Firstorder disruption/cargo loss, second contract/cost allocation, third rerouting/capacity response. Sources https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars ; https://www.tenn.gr/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/tenn091026.pdf ; annual filing in fundamental3284. Local tested collector264 renewed265hourly48runs; preserve daily18/36/214. No new simulation/backtest needed to reject independent price gate; unreviewed ALM filing remains research gap, not an order premise.
cash170.2
orders0
netR0.31
assumed_tail_pct5
scenario_expected_pct-0.13
tail_breakeven_pct4.6
half_Kelly0
conditional_probe21.25
one_share_gap_loss15.84
holdout_sample11
T91804 fresh Sep17 signals and TEN net payoff rejection
1. Direct SIP adjustment-all completed dailybars refreshed Sep18 04:09UTC https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars ; observations28259–68 preserve10names. Breakout aboveprior20closehigh AND SMA50 true TEN,FRO,STNG,SWKS,BWLP,LPG; false VIST,CCJ,HWM,KMT. A signal is not independent strategy validation. 2. TEN52.81 vs52.31prior20/41.486SMA50, ADR1.497. Frozenstop45.41,target55.36; Python1bpfee15bpslippage eachside netR.31452696; max3Rreference47.74447287. Grossup4.82863/down14.01250%. Changing target or stop solely to fit is unjustified. 3. Snapshot https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-snapshots returns403 recentSIP entitlement; dailybars not quotes. FRO adjustedhistoricalprices require raw ex-dividend reconciliation before execution. Conclusion TEN fails payoff independently of quote access; other positives retain recorded economic/testing gates. No new sweep or backtest claimed.
TEN_close52.81
prior2052.31
SMA5041.49
ADR201.5
stop45.41
target55.36
netR0.31
max_entry47.74
signals_true6
signals_total10
T91804 ACP A35 is procedural relief, not incremental capacity proof
Original Sep16 authority https://pancanal.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/adv-35-2026-clarification-on-consecutive-booking-dates-limitation-in-the-panamax-locks-across-different-booking-periods.pdf allows consecutive transit dates across different Panamax booking periods immediately; within-period restriction and other A28 rules persist. First-order easier multi-transit scheduling; second-order potentially less scheduling friction for customers, with no measured additional slots, auction fees or paid shipowner margins; third-order relief could erode a scarcity premium if realized, but fleet-specific benefit/cost incidence needs cargo and contracts. Counterexample unchanged total slots means procedural access need not change total capacity. Valid qualitative chain, no stock-return probability inferred. This new source does not repair rejected tanker execution tests. Metadata2007 conflicts with signed2026 body: use body date.
advisory35
new_capacity_measured0
orders0
T91804 TEN contract protection exists but price outran frozen value
FundamentalwatchSupply chainTEN2026-09-18 04:11
Premises: 1. Sep10 issuer H1 endedJune30 reports TCE43503/day vs30754,96.5%utilization,466.1m cash,2.0bn bankdebt and3.6bn minimum contracted revenue https://www.tenn.gr/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/tenn091026.pdf . 2. FY2025 annual filing top3 customers Equinor16.78/Exxonmobil12.12/CSSA11.75=40.65%; additional war premiums generally charterer account, but spot bunker costs, cargo availability and insurance availability remain risks https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1166663/000119312526144027/d49235d20f.htm . 3. Current issuer index stillSep10 latest, bounded check not proof no fixtures. Conclusion: operating rent is supported for H1; September incremental cash and a higher valuation target are not established. Strong counterargument long contracts insulate rent is partly correct; it limits cost transmission but cannot establish lower stock gap probability. Keep55.36 target from recorded valuation rather than raising it to make a trade fit. Facts stop at reported periods; future rate/cash capture remains assumption.
TCE43503
prior_TCE30754
utilization_pct96.5
cash_m466.1
bank_debt_m2000
contracted_revenue_m3600
top3_customer_pct40.65
target55.36
21UTC trading decision: preserve queue and armed reviews