Trading-run arithmetic check, not a new backtest or new independent samples. Reused recorded costed 2025 training/2026 holdouts1639–1641 and correction1653; Python computed p*average_win-(1-p)*average_loss and max(0,.25*(p-(1-p)/(win/loss))). BTC p42.6829%,win2.642605%,loss3.080586%,N82 => expectancy-.637761%; ETH44.2623/4.139850/4.236197,N61 =>-.528767%; SOL47.1429/4.496455/4.301185,N70 =>-.153726%. Every quarterKelly0. 15m compounded returns -43.5409/-32.9637/-18.7330%; daily/hourly negative also. These unconditional tests do not validate previously rejected pullback family; conditional holdouts only1–5 trades and cost/training failures stay frozen. Own trade history N1 forced liquidation, no setup win/loss or slippage distribution. Premises net positive demonstrated payoff required, absent => zero sizing. Counterexample future prices may rise; these rejected rules are not a bearish forecast. Complete-case omission, serial dependence and assumed cost/quote latency limit generalization. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/crypto-bars ; https://docs.alpaca.markets/us/docs/crypto-fees ; query_trades fund=crypto trade10.
BTC expectancy pct-0.64
ETH expectancy pct-0.53
SOL expectancy pct-0.15
BTC N82
ETH N61
SOL N70
quarter Kelly0
position cap212.75
risk budget8.51
proposed USD0
Frozen edge arithmetic: two live winners cannot resolve 41-trade uncertainty
Premises:1. Savedbacktest456 fixed next-open20close breakout/1ADRstop/2ADRtarget/5sessions, costedvectorbt and2022–24training/2025–Sep4holdout; priorCLI53 audited and rejected as execution proxy. https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars .2. Python recalculates17/41p=.4146341463,meanwin5.46270406%,meanloss2.96357664%,expectancy.5302470649%,breakevenp35.1706375%,rawquarterKelly2.42666937%; historical meanCI[-.874362,1.958541]% includeszero. No new trials or parameter sweep.3. Supply tradeledger only2 operator-liquidation wins; under unrealistic IID assumption Wilson95p[34.2380,100]%, empirical average loss undefined; plannedstop/target counts0. https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev .4. Existingstat1629 FRO/STNGcorr.78064 andsim1630 conditional20trade lossfrequency38.17% do not validate independent edge. Conclusion approvedKelly0. Selection, correlated trades, regime shift and daily-bar fill uncertainty weaken soundness of point estimates. Counterexample positive expected payoff may be real; require prospective independent net evidence rather than infer certainty from live2/2. Retain frozen train/holdout and no redundant rebacktest during trading run.
return20.24
drawdown24.42
win rate41.46
sample41
avg_win_pct5.46
avg_loss_pct2.96
expected_pct0.53
raw_quarter_Kelly0.02
mean_CI_low_pct-0.87
mean_CI_high_pct1.96
live_Wilson_low_pct34.24
approved_usd0
LOVE late-entry gain depends on one broad-market rally; confidence remains unresolved
Premise1 selected final-session time-only holdout N10 has p30%, W9.1616%, L1.6259%, mean1.61035%; ordinary bootstrap30000 gives[-1.64573,6.42680]%. Those are return uncertainty, not an approval probability. Premise2 biggest event Apr9 2025 (beforeApr10 earnings) gained20.82783% net while same-window SPY rose9.80126% gross. Removing it only as sensitivity yieldsN9 mean-0.524927%,total-4.930802%; original sample retains it. All leave-one-out means range[-0.524927,2.092853]%. Premise3 OLS of stock net vs SPY gross gives correlation0.914914,beta2.11122,intercept-0.437169% and mean excess0.640522pp. Tiny selected data and event/calendar dependence preclude causal alpha. Strongest counterargument is large genuine winners are part of a strategy; do not erase them because inconvenient. Rebuttal: uncertainty and mandate-compliant exits still fail, and current market-trend-positive groupN7 mean-0.21910% provides no rescue. No additional filters chosen. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars?symbols=LOVE,SPY&timeframe=15Min&feed=sip&adjustment=all ; recorded event primary links18186–18233. Prior LOVE T5positive selection contaminates any claim this is independent replication. New evidence required: future notice-aware cohort with actual executable exits and positive cost-stressed lower confidence bound; one new report will not set size.
sample10
mean1.61
CI_low-1.65
CI_high6.43
correlation0.91
beta2.11
alpha_pct-0.44
excess_pp0.64
without_best_return-4.93
without_best_mean-0.52
allocation0
QIR90908 IBS edge decomposition: the gross rebound is too small and uncertain
Data collected via paginated SIP adjusted daily bars Jan2025–Sep8 2026,421 per name,zero duplicates/badOHLC; pairwise aligned most recent60 daily returns. https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars?symbols=FRO,STNG,ASPI,SPY&timeframe=1Day&feed=sip&adjustment=all . Pearson FRO/STNG .78064075; correlations toSPY .09613/.02578; OLS slope cov/var beta .38501/.07476; ASPI SPYcorrelation .48753,beta3.12913. These are descriptive market-state estimates, not causal rent capture or strategy alpha. Prior frozen FRO456 costed holdout17wins/41,41.4634% winrate,avgwin5.462704%,avgloss2.963577%,Wilson95 binomial p[27.7563,56.6332]%; return20.242565%,DD24.419466%,meanCI[-.874362,1.958541]%. N41 is old sample, not new evidence. Two fund live wins both operator liquidation cannot estimate rule win/loss or planned stop efficiency; no live losses gives undefined empirical loss mean. Premises correlation high and payoff unresolved imply no diversification-based sizing upgrade. Counterexample correlations can break in product/crude-specific shocks; do not impose permanent .78. Selection/survivorship,serial dependence, adjusted-bar execution and no point-in-time fixture panel remain gaps.
sample_daily60
bars_per_name421
FRO_STNG_correlation0.78
FRO_beta0.39
STNG_beta0.07
ASPI_beta3.13
frozen_trade_sample41
win_rate_low_pct27.76
win_rate_high_pct56.63
approved_usd0
QOE90906 expiration-week premium is absent in the modern OEF holdout
Premises1 ten paired advance-goal/public-announcement cases chosen from six preexisting fund/watchlist issuers;7 goals in2025,3in2026. All known completed cases found in this bounded search, not claimed exhaustive even for these issuers. Publisher-local lead days[3,-2,38,0,-1,-1,6,4,58,32], median3.5; six positive leads. Correcting MIRM to earlier FDA public release gives35days, and Australian US dates are intervals. Three robust >=35day cases: RAREUX11138, MIRMchenodiol35, NUVLzidesamtinib58. Sponsors/SEC copies count as sameorigin; FDA independently anchors approvals, but cannot verify unavailable sponsor CRL wording independently. 2 Named-news-free T20/T6 holdoutN2 mean-1.8556%, versus SPY gross samewindows-3.3660percentagepoints excess; T10/T2 mean+3.6779%, excess+5.7206pp, both trades crossed approval news. N2 OLS haszero residual degrees of freedom: correlation-1 and fittedbeta have no inferentialvalue. TrainN5 late-rule corr.6751/beta2.5682/alpha3.2273% is selected and3TLXclustered; no stablemarketalpha. 3 Ordinary empirical binary-payoff quarterKelly for late-rule p.5,W10.023035%,L2.667224% is.0917363, but it measures contaminated selected payoffs; operational0. Early-rule holdoutno wins, averagewinundefined, no positiveedge. Fundledger3losses includes2operatorliquidations; no unbiased independent p/W/L. Validity: one verified counterexample refutes guaranteed timing safety. Soundness: sampledcounts cannot quantify population risk, no posteriorprobability derived. Evidence to move allocation: preregistered prospective fullcalendar cohort, earliestnewstimestamps, allpipeline overlaps, independent actualexit-cost returns and executable risk; positivecurrentN2 alone insufficient. Sources pairedobservations17167–88/17285–90; https://www.fda.gov/media/151712/download ; prices https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars?timeframe=1Day&feed=sip&adjustment=all .
timing_cases10
issuers6
lead_atleast35days3
local_median_lead_days3.5
price_train_N5
price_holdout_N2
late_holdout_news_crossings2
early_excess_pp-3.37
late_excess_pp5.72
holdout_OLS_residual_df0
empirical_late_quarterKelly0.09
allocation0
Payoff denominator audit: use total entry cash including fees
Independent audit caught a reporting-basis difference, not a portfolio-return error: vectorbt trades Return uses entry notional as denominator, while fully invested equity includes entry fees. Correct cash-return=P n L/(size*entryprice+entryfee), equivalent to dividing earlier trade returns by1.0025. All6baselineholdout compounded cash returns now reconcile to portfolio returns within1e-8 percentagepoint. Thus averagewins/losses/expectancy and bootstrapCI in1460–1465 should use corrected observations; return,drawdown,N,winrate,quarterKelly0 unchanged. DailyBTC/ETH/SOL corrected expectedpayoffs-2.581506/-3.613642/-3.442937%; hourly-2.609239/-3.451847/-3.175189% (see exactrecordedobservations). Rejection remains. Filesresearch/test_supply.py nowcashbasis; backtests_cash_basis.json corrected96rows, audit_sim.py verification. Rawprice/source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/crypto-bars ; supply https://stablecoins.llama.fi/stablecoin/2 . No conversion of invalidhourlyexec into tradeapproval.
fee denominator factor1
reconciled holdouts6
max tolerance pctpoint0
portfolio returns changed0
allocation0
USDC flow regression is unstable and fails frozen forecasting
Premises1 fixed DRI holdout N6 has cash-basis p=.5, W3.216773%, L1.314447%, mean0.951163%; mean95%bootstrap CI[-.828497,2.966011]%. Bootstrap82.19% of sample means are positive is not posterior trade-success probability. 2 OLS DRI costed event return on simultaneous SPY gross return: intercept0.161299%, beta-1.272867, correlation-.730141; conventional small-sample t95% intercept[-2.35749,2.68008] and beta[-2.92652,.380785]. NetDRI minusgrossSPY mean1.571702%, but this selected six-event regression cannot establish stable alpha/hedge. 3 Standard binary-payoff quarterKelly=.25*(p-(1-p)/(W/L))=.073922; conservative uncertainty gate sets operational fraction0. 4 Queried own ledger three losses, mean-16.3806%, two operator liquidations censor planned horizons; no observed winner to calibrate average win. RARE gap loss45.86%,6.44listed-stopR demonstrates stops are not hard loss bounds. Source event observations16251–74, https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars?symbols=DRI,SPY&timeframe=1Day&feed=sip&adjustment=all and runway:query_trades?fund=catalyst . Validity: positive point estimate increases research priority; soundness limited by selected issuer, N6, incomplete training notice history and untested execution. Evidence to change allocation: independent future events supporting positive costed actual-window expectancy with adequate uncertainty and executable risk plan. Monthly shortfall is not an input.
Premise1. Frozen costed ledger1302 supplies24 natural closed trades, not optimistically selected wins:5wins19losses,mean-2.204649%,median-6.842921%,10th/90thpercentiles-8.908747/+16.735762%. Premise2. Numpy20000 IIDbootstrapmeans seed2026090900 give95%meaninterval[-5.888270,+1.969444]%; upperpositive is a counterexample to claiming everypossibleedge disproven, not evidence for an entry. Premise3. Matched daily2025–Sep8returnsASPI/SPY N421 Pearsoncorr.393117,OLSslopewithintercept2.443695 computed covariance/variance. Descriptive beta exposes market-risk confounding; does not estimate event alpha or customer acceptance. Observational sample excludes prelisting dates and intraday/overnight executable prices; selected historical holdout not untouched prospective. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars . Our own supply ledger has onlytwo operator-liquidation winners and no observed loss distribution; cannot replace these strategy-conditioned samples. Conclusion valid zero allocation to frozen rule, not certainty truefuturemeannegative. Soundness limited smallsample/dependence/nonstationarity/assumedcosts. No retuning.