Existing job12 September4 IEX completed bars: FRO46.15 versus prior20close45.43, ADR20=1.23575; STNG82.345 versus81.46, ADR20=1.67. Both simple breakouts true but eligible false. Existing job44 six-name prior20close AND SMA50 signals all false. These are readbacks of previously recorded data, not fresh session prices; holiday does not add outcomes. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars .
Relevant validation retained: FRO frozen backtest456 N41 return20.242565%, drawdown24.419466%, win41.463415%, average win5.462704% and loss2.963577%; mean95% block interval[-0.874362,1.958541]% prevents sizing. AA/CENX exact-exit analyses615/616 lose3.940576%/21.602593% on22/26 holdout entries, unlike five-close base returns. Monte Carlo618 and indicator612 retained: resampling adds no independent observations and selecting favorable neighbor after holdout is invalid. CLI and vectorbt tests were already recorded; no repeated/new backtest or simulation claimed this run.
A defensible future order must pass physical evidence, firm cash, independently validated costed stop/target/horizon and fresh executable prices together. One-to-two measured daily ranges bounds plausible target selection but does not create a setup. No current stop or target recommendation, no proposed capital. Historical15-minute monitoring and extended-session slippage gaps remain.
1. CompletedSep4 closes SPY770.19,IWM296.01,EFA108.35,EEM68.70,TLT82.21. RSI2 sequences (oldest to latest): SPY52.00/85.10/56.24,IWM56.84/68.73/77.39,EFA48.58/82.31/84.74,EEM65.60/82.61/96.38,TLT24.46/52.49/74.53. None meets three declining readings starting below65;TLT also below SMA20086.247. 2. Position cap212.7475 permits0/0/1/3/2whole shares; quant cash245.69 and nominal account risk cap8.5099. SPY illustrates1ATR stop764.95314,target778.04529,notorders; ATR5.23686 andADR4.40956. 3.Four other instruments' levels/liquidity/nominalrisk are recorded. EEM/TLT also fail1.5ATR<=2ADR target gate. Conclusion size0, no queued entry; latest prices are Friday references, not executable Monday quotes. Affordability or trend cannot replace a signal and validated exits. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars ; technical.json and final feasibility observations. Flat book has no held-R/target/horizon progress to review.
SPY close770.19
SPY RSI256.24
SPY SMA200712.15
SPY ATR205.24
SPY ADR204.41
SPY illustrative stop764.95
SPY illustrative target778.05
position cap212.75
account risk cap8.51
current signals0
actual size0
GIS September4 range and support do not justify stretched exits
Completed September4 SIP daily bars, retrieved September7, not live executable quotes. AA close49.97 is above SMA50=48.6814 but below prior20 closing high54.08; CENX46.775 is above45.6459 but below52.29. Both conjunctive entries fail. AA/CENX20-session returns are -.1997%/-8.6961%, ADR20 is2.01799/2.496905 or4.0384%/5.3381% of price. Trailing20 annualized volatility48.9472%/43.6170%; mean traded dollars237.786m/90.245m per day says nothing about holiday quote depth.
Hypothetical stop/target scales, not proposals: AA47.95201/54.00598, CENX44.278095/51.76881. Positioncap212.7475 permits4 shares each, but nominalADR risk8.5099 permits4 AA or3 CENX. Actual gaps and 15-minute sampling can exceed the nominal1% equity loss. Whole-share arithmetic is an upper bound, not edge-based authorization. Binding entry and payoff gates both fail, so approved quantity0. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars .
AA_close49.97
AA_prior2054.08
AA_SMA5048.68
AA_ADR202.02
CENX_close46.77
CENX_prior2052.29
CENX_SMA5045.65
CENX_ADR202.5
AA_signal0
CENX_signal0
AA_whole_share_risk_cap4
CENX_whole_share_risk_cap3
Universe and executable-cost screen: breakout conditions remain research only
Premises:1 Favorable underlying direction is not optionmispricing.2 Basehit exits must fit observedrange and fullpremium risk.3 No simulated winrate after failed pricing/exitgate. AtSep4 S andfrozenvol, reprice after immediate favorable1.5ATR14 with zeroelapsedtime and unchangedvol/remainingT; bidproxy=max(0,fair-halfspread). This intentionally optimistic upper diagnostic does NOT model time-to-target,IVcrush or15minchecks. EEMC73.5 targetbid.09549205 versusask.07 => net+$2.349205 after$.20fee; fullpremium+fee$7.20, reward/fullrisk.32628<1.5. TLTP79.5 targetbid.06787634 versusask.03 =>+$3.587634 against$3.20risk,ratio1.12114<1.5. BestpositivebidGLD targetnet-$2.20. These nearest positivebid legs already fail baselineindependentvalue. Fullrisk not tightened to a nominalstop to evade cap; everypremium is atrisk betweenregularsessions. No target/stop/order proposed. All187 targetvalues andATR inputs recorded; no claim all other targets evaluated foroptimalR/R beyond thisdiagnostic. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars?symbols=EEM,TLT,GLD&timeframe=1Day&feed=iex&adjustment=all andvenueoptionchains. Counterargument faster/jumpmoves could win; evidence of theircostedprobability ismissing.
EEM_target_bid0.1
EEM_target_net2.35
EEM_fullrisk7.2
EEM_reward_risk0.33
TLT_target_bid0.07
TLT_target_net3.59
TLT_fullrisk3.2
TLT_reward_risk1.12
GLD_best_target_net-2.2
allocation0
UAMY price fails breakout and trend filter despite a large drawdown
Premise1 completedSep6 close BTC80343.4945,ETH2515.445,SOL106.529 each above20/50daySMA:77255.03/69405.99,2419.67/2102.98,98.5177/84.4014.7day+3.4346/+4.0807/+4.6968%,ADR14 3.1492/3.8647/5.8714%; sourceobservations7454-56. Trendcontext positive, but neither entry rule nor incident specificity. Raw daily olderhigh/low integrity unresolved in inherited journal; ADRs illustrative pending full aggregationaudit. Premise2 current04:06quotes7460 roundtriploss.5265/.5313/.5639% at25bptakerfee eachside before extraslip. Displayed asks79.09/82.69/99.90USD versus212.75positioncap; single level not fullbook/filledcapacity. Premise3 genericbounce costedholdouts518-523fail, and prior398-400rules remain rejected; combinecontext cannot repair negativeedge. NominalR:R1.5 from measured ranges reduces after fees and can overshoot under15min venuechecks. Conclusion no defensible incident stop/target or order, cash. Counterexample limitmaking/continuedtrend couldprofit, but makerfill/adverseselection uncalibrated. Sources https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/crypto-bars ; https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/crypto-snapshots ; https://docs.alpaca.markets/us/docs/crypto-fees .
BTC ADR14 pct3.15
ETH ADR14 pct3.86
SOL ADR14 pct5.87
BTC roundtrip pct0.53
ETH roundtrip pct0.53
SOL roundtrip pct0.56
BTC7d pct3.43
ETH7d pct4.08
SOL7d pct4.7
allocation0
FRO range and affordability: four tail puts fail even an immediate favorable move
September4 completed rawclose31.90 above SMA50=29.3594 and SMA200=27.2321. ATR20simpleTR0.42093,ADR20meanrange0.321705; illustrative1ATRstop31.47907,target32.531395,trail1.31953%,target1.96265ADR. Levels use all20completedbars and are not orders. Six whole shares cost191.40 and nominal risk2.52558, below212.7475position cap and8.5099account risk cap; median20session dollarvolume17.2938m suggests small order capacity, not proof of extended-session depth. August12m DBCreturn45.64914%,BIL3.71127%; excess difference41.93787pp or relative-wealth40.43714%, same sign and reconciles prior journal. Premises: a positive state is not a new monthly formation; September1entry passed and next potential new cohort isOctober, with independent execution validation still required. Conclusion no catch-up entry; empirical swing Kelly0, actualquantity0. Counterexample: affordability and uptrend are both true, yet neither estimates net edge. Price source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars ; bar semantics https://docs.alpaca.markets/us/docs/market-data-faq . Stops sampled every15minutes can gap: historical median overshoot0.1291R,maximum0.9306R beyond triggeredstop; nominal risk is not guaranteed loss.
close31.9
SMA5029.36
SMA20027.23
ATR200.42
ADR200.32
illustrative stop31.48
illustrative target32.53
target ADR1.96
whole shares cap6
six-share nominal risk2.53
maximum stop overshoot R0.93
actual quantity0
TLX upward trend does not provide a compliant short-window exit geometry
Premise1 persisted job21/note511/observation7401 supplies six fresh clock-calibrated OKX funding/OI fields at21:01UTC. Sep7 00UTC forecast BTC+.250895bp,ETH+.577675bp,SOL-.334966bp; prior settlement fields+.16555/+.247753/-.168069bp. Periods differ; no new settlement or funding income for spot claimed. Premise2 OI coin26202.5113/590904.877/2880986.56 is one exchange, neither net direction nor global leverage. Premise3 recorded price rules398-400 remain rejected; no new completed UTCday since prior review or independent validation. Counterexample SOL may squeeze, but magnitude percentile and conditional net payoff remain unestablished. Conclusion keep zero, collect prospectively. Sources https://www.okx.com/api/v5/public/time ; https://www.okx.com/api/v5/public/funding-rate ; https://www.okx.com/api/v5/public/open-interest .
Premises1 clock-calibrated primary OKX sixfields all fresh, observed Sep6 19:41:53; BTC/ETH/SOL nextSep7 00UTC forecasts +.265675/+.501640/-.319571bp versus prior settled fields+.165550/+.247753/-.168069bp. These refer to different periods; funding is not spot income. 2 OI coin26284.590/595231.470/2888254.210 measured atonevenue; not global leverage or net direction. 3 No completedUTCday since previous review, no new independently validated rule. Reuse costed daily/hourly backtests398-400; no reoptimization. Counterargument negativeSOL funding could precede squeeze, but magnitude percentile and independent conditional price payoff unestablished. Conclusion zero; no claim all future strategies fail. Source https://www.okx.com/api/v5/public/funding-rate ; https://www.okx.com/api/v5/public/open-interest ; https://www.okx.com/api/v5/public/time .
BTC forecast bp0.27
ETH forecast bp0.5
SOL forecast bp-0.32
SOL settled field bp-0.17
fresh fields6
eligible0
16:32 settled funding refresh changes observation, not rule eligibility
Premises1 primary OKX history confirms Sep6 16UTC realized BTC+.165550bp,ETH+.247753bp,SOL-.168069bp; current nextSep7 00UTC forecasts+.173880/+.249726/-.214409bp. Period reconciliation resolves earlierSOL positive settlement versus negative forecast: different periods, not conflicting sources. Endpoint+history are one exchange, not independent corroboration. 2 spotmid BTC79760.88,ETH2483.625,SOL106.124; versus priorrawdailyclose-.10154/+.14948/+2.86822%. PartialSep6 cannot replace completed daily signal475; prior20 thresholds81269.4915/2515.933/109.15 remain prior diagnostics. 3 governing daily/hourly backtests398-400 rejected; new settlement is no costed price edge. Conclusion retainzero. Counterargument negativefunding plus SOL strength could precede squeeze, but no extreme distribution or independent conditional net payoff measured. OI rawcoin/USD recorded7353/7356/7359; cannot infer global positioning or causality. Sources https://www.okx.com/api/v5/public/funding-rate-history ; https://www.okx.com/api/v5/public/funding-rate ; https://www.okx.com/api/v5/public/open-interest ; https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/crypto-snapshots .
BTC settled bp0.17
ETH settled bp0.25
SOL settled bp-0.17
SOL next forecast bp-0.21
SOL intraday pct2.87
eligible0
13:52 trading refresh: unchanged completed signals and forecast reversal do not revive rejected rules
Premises: 1. Live ledger0open/0pending; noholdingR,targetprogress ordaysheld to manage. 2. Last completed jobs12/16 useSep4IEXbars: two tankerbreakouts true; six candidatecombinedsignalsfalse, exactinputs newlyrecorded. 3. Prior test456 gate remainsnegative/inconclusive even with truebreakout. Therefore neither false nortrueindicator overrides validatededge requirement. Friday ADR describes past range, not an executableTuesdayentry or overnightstopguarantee; no stop/target numbers proposed for absentpositions. Any future proposal requires freshentryquote, wholelots under212.7475USD, totalnominalrisk<=8.5099USD, realistic1–2ADRtarget and at least1.5R, quarterKellyfromvalidatednetedge andcombinedfundcap278.67. Actual15minute/extendedfills remain unvalidated. No new bars or technicalbacktest claimed. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars ; live list_jobs/query_trades fund=supply.
FRO_close46.15
FRO_ADR201.24
STNG_close82.34
STNG_ADR201.67
tanker_breakouts2
other_candidate_signals0
live_positions0
proposed_usd0
Chewy September18 event-mixture prices reject both affordable contracts
Premises: 1. Independent value must exceed entry ask plus costs and eventual exit spread. 2. Contract identity and synchronized executable prices are necessary. 3. Affordable far tails must not inherit the near-money event signal without repricing. One new bounded Sep18 chain for the event-timing question, not a repeat broad screen: https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/option-chain/CHWY?feed=indicative&expiration_date_gte=2026-09-18&expiration_date_lte=2026-09-18 .86 contracts,72 positive uncrossed bid/asks,71 within120s ofSep4 20UTC; two positive-bid asks<=.08, onlyone fresh and neither both fresh and supplied IV/Greeks. All72 quote/own midpointIV records and two candidate models saved7150–7272. S23.67 Sep4 adjustedIEX close; T9/252 sessionsSep8–18 excludingLaborDay; r4%,q0 assumptions. European BSM C=S*N(d1)-K*exp(-rT)*N(d2), P=K*exp(-rT)*N(-d2)-S*N(-d1), d1=[ln(S/K)+(r+.5sigma²)T]/(sigma sqrtT),d2=d1-sigma sqrtT. Baseline sigma=sqrt(mean(RV21²,RV63²,EWMA.94²))=.4251999734. Event value=mean_i BSM(S exp(J_i-logmeanexpJ),K,T,sigma_bg), J16 train overnight loggaps, sigma_bg=.4692621765 RMS last63 non-event reaction-day-excluded close returns. This is a normalized empirical jump mixture plus diffusion, not risk-neutral calibration or a proven fair bound; absence of specific macro jumps/holiday variance is a gap. Stress .5J and .8sigma_bg. C37.5 bid.03 ask.05, quote19:59:56.075826325Z, sizes10/111, feedIV/Greeks missing; own midpointIV114.8134%. Basefair2.2591e-9,event.000128648,stress8.6473e-9; net event value-$5.1871/contract after assumed$.20 cost, before exit spread. P17.5 bid.01 ask.06, quote19:55:02.708578169Z fails120s,size1/1,feedIV87.58%, own midpointIV84.1800%, delta-.0235,gamma.0148,theta-.0086,vega.0024,rho-.0002. Basefair.0000307554,event.003120578,stress.0000276989; netevent-$5.8879. Stress cost$1.30 gives net-$6.3000/-$7.2972. ATM K23.5 callask1.59,putask1.35,total2.94=12.4208%S; event-modelsum2.591478 versus baseline1.519364. The sum includes nine sessions and macro risk, not pure earnings-implied standard deviation. Not a two-leg proposal; each leg premium135/159 exceeds8.5099 risk. BSM American exercise/dividends/deliverables unverified; physical versus risk-neutral distribution differs. Provider https://docs.alpaca.markets/us/docs/historical-option-data confirms indicative quotes are modified and trades delayed derivatives. Prior OPRA/history403 not retried absent change. Negative gaps fail even optimistic research model; allocationzero, no arbitrage claim.
contracts86
positive_bid_quotes72
affordable2
fresh_affordable1
fresh_with_feedGreeks0
S23.67
baseline_vol_pct42.52
event_background_vol_pct46.93
call_event_fair0
put_event_fair0
ATM_ask_sum2.94
ATM_event_model_sum2.59
Execution window audit: prior levels do not authorize pre-open orders
Sep4 descriptive tape: XLI175.24 vsSMA50 181.1799,ATR14 2.332857,ADR20 2.01525;SMH567.05 vs573.8605,ATR15.288929,ADR11.31175. XLB52.45/ATR.8575, XLE64.07/ATR1.121786, XLP84.59/ATR1.034286, IYT84.17/ATR1.146071, SPY770.18/ATR5.476429; all exact levels in observations. Under212.7475 position cap whole-share affordability XLI1,SMH0,XLB4,XLE3,XLP2,IYT2,SPY0; theoretical fractional tests are not actual whole-share orders. Aug3–Sep4 recent IEX regular15min audit:25days×26bars eachXLI/SMH, dailyhigh/low/close match aggregation; only1/31extended bars respectively, inadequate for after-hours stop validation. XLI SIP vsIEX OHLC maxdifference.39USD across25days; rawvsadjusted same in this window, not proof across corporate actions. Seven fixed-entry matched exit probes use regular15minclose threshold and nextbaropen, samefees/slip. Four worse,two better,one unchanged vsdaily touches. SMHAug19stop worsens−77.2283bp to−5.21703%; XLIAug19−25.2196bp. These are sampled-exit sensitivities,notvenuequote/fill reconstruction; entry cohorts fixed and not new portfolio backtest. Baseline598holdouttrades include49gapstops, worstnet−2.08966R; a nominal1Rstop is not a1Rloss bound. No invented exit levels or live orders. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars .
XLI_close175.24
XLI_ATR142.33
SMH_close567.05
SMH_ATR1415.29
intraday_days25
sampled_exit_n7
sampled_worse4
SMH_extra_loss_bp-77.23
XLI_extra_loss_bp-25.22
holdout_gap_stops49
worst_net_R-2.09
proposed_usd0
Pullback execution audit: identical returns can conceal deeper hourly drawdowns
Premises: 1. No holdings or queued orders exist, so R progress, target completion and holding horizon are not applicable. 2. September 4 raw closes are SPY $770.19, QQQ $718.96, IWM $296.01, EFA $108.35 and EEM $68.70. The $212.7475 position cap permits zero whole shares of the first three, one EFA or three EEM. 3. SPY has SMA50 $756.8572, SMA200 $712.1529, prior-20-session ATR $5.29611 and recent ADR $4.40956. An illustrative one-ATR stop $764.89389 and 1.5-ATR target $778.13417 are not validated overnight exits; the target is about 1.8 ordinary daily ranges, not an established one-night expectation. 4. Liquidity is ample at our size in regular trading: SPY median recent daily dollar volume about $28.04bn, but that does not establish overnight spreads or fractional exit access. EFA/EEM affordability does not fix their negative holdouts. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars; technicals.json. Alpaca's market-data FAQ states extended-hours condition T updates daily volume but not daily OHLC, while minute-bar prices can update: https://docs.alpaca.markets/us/docs/market-data-faq . Therefore daily bars do not reconstruct overnight stop paths or guarantee official auction fills. Targets are illustrative and no order is proposed.
SPY close770.19
SPY ATR20 lagged5.3
SPY ADR204.41
SPY SMA50756.86
SPY SMA200712.15
SPY whole shares0
EFA whole shares1
EEM whole shares3
position cap212.75
risk cap8.51
actual notional0
HAIN affordable shares do not fix failed edge or weak range-based reward/risk
Sep4 IEXclose.7521,SMA20 .68332,SMA50 .605924,20sessionreturn26.12779%,annualized20dayclosevol140.95628%. ADR20 .061115,ATR14 .074685714;20daylow.5116/high.9048;meanIEXvolume18547.95 partialmarket,not totalADV. TwoADR target.87433 versuslow20stop.5116 givesR/R.50823,below1.5. ATRstop.6774143 would be a diagnosticrangebarrier,not demonstratedthesisinvalidation. At65whole shares cost48.8865 beforefees, low20risk15.6325>account1%8.5099;max35shares from that stopdistance alone,stillrejectedonedge. Worsthistoricalovernightgap-30.43478%,not upperlossbound;65sharelossatthatgap~14.88USD. Close canchangebeforeTuesday; no queuedlimit or currentquote claim. Fractionals unnecessary for affordabilitybutnofillliquidityverified. No holdingRprogress toreview. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars?symbols=HAIN,SPY,XLP&timeframe=1Day&feed=iex&adjustment=all ; venuecontextbook49.14/account850.99.
close0.75
sma200.68
sma500.61
adr200.06
atr140.07
low200.51
target_diagnostic0.87
reward_risk0.51
affordable_shares65
stop_risk_65shares15.63
account_risk_budget8.51
worst_gap_pct-30.43
145 affordable XLF contracts: only the unvalidated forecast creates apparent cheap legs
Premises:1 buy at ask, not midpoint;2 own value must cover costs;3 indicative quote gaps cannot certify execution. Venue chain two pages1060contracts,1059quote timestamps within120s ofSep4 20UTC;145positivebid with0<bid<=ask<=.08. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/option-chain/XLF?feed=indicative&expiration_date_gte=2026-09-08&expiration_date_lte=2026-10-16 collectedSep6. Every affordable contract quote,size,IV/Greeks and three prices recorded individually. Independent BSM C=Sexp(-qT)N(d1)-Kexp(-rT)N(d2); P=Kexp(-rT)N(-d2)-Sexp(-qT)N(-d1);d1=[log(S/K)+(r-q+sigma²/2)T]/(sigma sqrt(T)),d2=d1-sigma sqrt(T). S58.10 from adjustedIEXSep4close; r=.04 assumption; q=.0138 trailing issuerdistribution approximation. T business sessions afterSep4 through expiry/252 excludingSep7; not a demonstrated closurevariance law. Volatility blend=.123024895,HAR=.159929506,adverse=.8min=.098419916. Net fair-ask-.002/share assumes$.20fee/contract; actual fees unverified, bidexit modeled separately. Zero baseline net positives,3HAR positives,0adverse. HAR flags: Sep18K60.5call fair.080069 ask.07 (+.008069 net),Sep30K62call .069420 ask.06(+.007420),Sep8K57.5put .044865 ask.04(+.002865). HAR calibration failed improvement test, so do not switch to it because its valuations are larger. Sep18K60.5call bid.04ask.07,size371/508,quote19:59:59.404611235Z,feedIV.1509,delta.0776,gamma.0914,theta-.0101,vega.0153; midpoint-calibratedsessionIV.145572289. Samecontract blend fair.025136 and adverse.006631. Cashdividend schedule/OCCdeliverable/Americanexercise not fullyverified; BSM is European approximation, not claimed fair-value bound. Full premium7+fee.20=7.20 fits8.5099 risk but fails economic edge. Existing executablefeed/history gates staybinding. Source provenance https://docs.alpaca.markets/us/docs/historical-option-data ; dividend input https://www.ssga.com/us/en/intermediary/etfs/state-street-financial-select-sector-spdr-etf-xlf .