Edge test: S2.85 Oct16 P2.5 .15 Sep9 costs$15; requires -17.543860%,2/8=25%; medianabsolute16.578014%. Sep23AMC, defaultSep22exit. https://investors.stitchfix.com/news-events/press-releases/news-details/2026/Stitch-Fix-Announces-Date-for-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Fiscal-Year-2026-Financial-Results-and-Conference-Call/default.aspx 1. Use fixed previous close to first post-release daily close horizon; no hindsight intraday lows. 2. Primary issuer scheduling originals and each daily response saved in observations; SIP adjustment=all daily bars https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars. Accessible historical schedules selected without return filtering; SFIX lacks Dec2024/Mar2025 and TCOM lacks verified Aug2024/May2025 timing, so sample is incomplete, not representative by assertion. 3. Current catalog closes checked against delayed option-bars; neither is an executable ask or synchronized quote. Coverage is below40% and no documented actual-option expected payout>=3x. Hurdle exceeds absolute median, so no hold-through exception. ExpiryOct16 exceeds event by>=7days. Counterexample: residual option time value can pay despite absent intrinsic coverage, but no costed history establishes it. Valid conditional rejection; soundness limited by stale marks, sparse samples and regime changes. Required evidence to reconsider: nearer affordable current contract with >=40% directional coverage or documented3xexpectedpayoff, then costs/exits. No order.
Edge test: S3.05 Oct16 P2.5 .10 Sep9 costs$10; requires -21.311475%, 0/12 closes; median absolute10.350471%. Sep15 08ET release, last-session exitSep14. https://investors.verabradley.com/news-releases/news-release-details/vera-bradley-inc-announces-reporting-date-second-quarter-1 1. Use fixed previous close to first post-release daily close horizon; no hindsight intraday lows. 2. Primary issuer scheduling originals and each daily response saved in observations; SIP adjustment=all daily bars https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars. Accessible historical schedules selected without return filtering; SFIX lacks Dec2024/Mar2025 and TCOM lacks verified Aug2024/May2025 timing, so sample is incomplete, not representative by assertion. 3. Current catalog closes checked against delayed option-bars; neither is an executable ask or synchronized quote. Coverage is below40% and no documented actual-option expected payout>=3x. Hurdle exceeds absolute median, so no hold-through exception. ExpiryOct16 exceeds event by>=7days. Counterexample: residual option time value can pay despite absent intrinsic coverage, but no costed history establishes it. Valid conditional rejection; soundness limited by stale marks, sparse samples and regime changes. Required evidence to reconsider: nearer affordable current contract with >=40% directional coverage or documented3xexpectedpayoff, then costs/exits. No order.
sample12
median_absolute_pct10.35
put_coverage0
put_hurdle_pct-21.31
QTR9110200 holdout exposure and trade-record calibration
Premises:1 Observ23064complete24hourdays show large historical O/H/L/V discrepancies despite smallclose differences. 2 Additionalcontrol masks supplied daily on exactlysame complete-day calendar as reconstructed data and recomputes indicators, rather than cherry-picking prices. 3 Fixed20daystrategy matched versus reconstructed returns identical to floatingpoint:BTCtrain+.569980%,holdout+4.831708%;ETHtrain+31.615468%,holdout-6.406080%;SOLtrain+21.135460%,holdout-7.586258%. Conclusion the full-versus-reconstructed sign/magnitude change here is explained by coverage/warmupmask, not demonstrated OHLCcorrection alpha. Full suppliedBTC-5.685453% versus matched+4.831708% highlights missing-data fragility, not reason to choose winner. BTCmatchedtrain stress-2.791931% and holdoutN5 small. Validity of exact control supports attribution for this experiment only; other rules can remain price-sensitive. No gap filling or missingbar execution allowed. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/crypto-bars .
BTC_full_daily_holdout-5.69
BTC_matched_holdout4.83
BTC_matched_train0.57
BTC_matched_train_stress-2.79
ETH_matched_holdout-6.41
SOL_matched_holdout-7.59
matched_daily_holdout_bars252
full_daily_holdout_bars253
QTR9110000 clustered trend payoff uncertainty and zero training Kelly
Premises:1 Collected100 consecutive8h OKX USDT-swap settled rates per asset, Aug9 00UTC–Sep11 00UTC, observations23045–47. 2 Latest settled percentile BTC70/ETH18/SOL34; 5th/95th bounds BTC.005875/1, ETH.129385/1,SOL-.727958/1bp. 3 Current indicative rates are not final settlements and one venue is not global leverage. Conclusion none is an outer5% extreme in this sample; no contrarian funding entry. Valid inference descriptive ranking, not prediction. Counterexample longer regime or other venue can be extreme; price effect requires time-aligned costed predictive test. Mean rates .620243/.619086/.248752bp per8h;100 normalized payments total .620243/.619086/.248752% of constant notional over33days inclusive timestamps, before hedging/costs; Alpaca cash spot cannot collect short-perpetual carry here. Non-independent adjacent observations, changing OI and no exchange-flow attribution limit inference. Source https://www.okx.com/api/v5/public/funding-rate-history .
sample_per_asset100
BTC_percentile70
ETH_percentile18
SOL_percentile34
BTC_sum_bp62.02
ETH_sum_bp61.91
SOL_sum_bp24.88
approved0
N911 Panama two-vintage audit: congestion increases despite fewer arrivals
Premises observations23009-10. Python computes AugustvsJuly canal-hours+37.50985%,9.52h;transits-2.46445%;arrivals-6.49718%;nontransit difference of averages14.51->23.63h. Sources https://pancanal.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/adv-34-2026-monthly-canal-operations-summary-august-2026.pdf and https://pancanal.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/ADV-26-2026-Monthly-Canal-Operations-Summary-July-2026.pdf .Two months, different vessel mixes; difference ofmeans not mean waiting time for a matched cohort. No regression/correlation causal claim. Julybookings112.27% flags denominator mismatch; neither slots nor cumulative usedbookings equals physical utilization. Conclusion stronger congestion watch, unproven listed-stock rent; no auction-price data. Authority directly observes transits but omits rerouted vessels, rejected cargo and issuer economics. Prior qualitative congestion plausible; this increases confidence in congestion, not numerical stock-win probability. Counterexample weaker arrivals may signal demand destruction while capacity maintenance raises elapsedtime. Hard sustainable36-38dailycapacity is route/mix conditional.
months2
canal_hours_change_pct37.51
transit_change_pct-2.46
arrival_change_pct-6.5
extra_hours9.52
nontransit_july_hours14.51
nontransit_aug_hours23.63
MID911 attack the loss distribution: a stop is not a maximum loss
1 Querytrades shows no holdings/pending/closing; all3closedlosses, MIRM-.4393%,IONS-2.8424%,RARE-45.8601%. 2 Twooperatorliquidations censor intendedhorizons; do not fit strategywinrate/slippage distribution toN3. 3 RAREactual6.44R shows unboundedstop risk; contemporaneousquotes/sessiondata missing, so do not attribute all shortfall tobroker slippage. Conclusion no liveexits toreset and no empiricallypositiveKelly here. Counterexample: twoforcedclosures could laterhavewon, which prevents universalnegativeedge inference, not entryvalidation. Full49.14fund at historicalRAREloss wouldlose22.5356=2.6482%account850.99; this is stressscenario,notworstcase. Wholefundtotal loss5.774%account exceedsfewpercent. Source runway:query_trades?fund=catalyst .
sample3
uncensored_sample1
realized-31.94
win_rate0
RARE_loss_pct45.86
RARE_loss_R6.44
fund_gap_scenario_loss22.54
account_gap_scenario_pct2.65
POST910 frozen event evidence still rejects allocation
Edge reference: frozen HITI N9 issuer-dated earnings daily responses, median absolute5.494505%; at S2.56 Oct16K2.5 C.31 requires+9.765625%,P.16 requires-8.593750%,each1/9=11.111%<40%; no >=3x expected-payoff mispricing documented. HAIN/EPM/ZUMZ have N0 validated comparable-event samples in this review, meaning untested, not0% wins. Premises: (1) HAIN .33 Sep9close was a13:59 trade with stock.681–.6839, intrinsic.3161–.319; newer.37 Sep10 13:55 traded with stock.6484–.6583,intrinsic.3417–.3516. Thus both marks exceed entire matched-minute intrinsic ranges. (2) HITI empirical responses22929–37 unchanged; NumPy recomputation uses signed returns. Fourofnine needed: price ceiling.0015525call/.08065934put atfixedS2.56, beforecosts. Validity: matching time removes asynchronous false comparison; soundness: minute data do not establish simultaneous executable quotes, adjusted deliverables or fairvalue. Counterexample: an unobserved executable cheaper ask could change decision, but none documented. HAINstandardK1 at.37 maximum payout2.702703xpremium even atS0, less than3xexpectedpayout and less than4xprice neededfor3Rnettarget onfullpremiumrisk. Size0. HAIN>=8eventcollection deferred because present candidate alreadyfails payoffhardbound; not presented as failedbacktest. Sources https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars ; /data/option-bars; option_contracts. Issuer datesSep14HAINBMO https://ir.hain.com/news-releases/news-release-details/hain-celestial-announces-fiscal-2026-fourth-quarter-and-full andHITIAMC https://hightideinc.com/high-tide-to-announce-third-fiscal-quarter-2026-financial-results/ .
Premises: 1. Re-read2183–2185 costed vectorbt tests:2025train, REUSED2026Jan1-Sep9holdout,25bpfees/side10bpslippage20stress; all36hourlycellslose and supplied dailynegative. 2. Python recomputation22952 pW-(1-p)L and .5*(p-(1-p)/(W/L)) produces negative expectancy and allocation for all3. 3. Sole actualBTC10 operator liquidation does not calibrate setup odds or order slippage. Conclusion zero allocation to recorded compression rule. Validity: positive-edge requirement fails; soundness limited by smallN, reusedholdout, unresolved historical aggregation errors. Counterexample: an independent different rule may profit, so rejection is not a bearish price forecast. Current>=3Rtarget/+2Ratmostquarter exits differ from frozen1.5R rule and need independentdaily/hourly plus15minexecution evidence. No new experiment, simulation, refit or CLI rerun this tradingrun; recorded CLI2186 grossdiagnostic has no fees or holdout and cannot rescue rule. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/crypto-bars .
BTC_E_pct-1.27
ETH_E_pct-1.77
SOL_E_pct-0.74
BTC_halfKelly-0.23
ETH_halfKelly-0.35
SOL_halfKelly-0.1
BTC_N12
ETH_N9
SOL_N8
approved_notional0
QTR9102100 existing holdout and capital audit retain zero live sizing
Premises:1. Fresh fundledger3closed operatorliquidations,0active/pending/closing; censoring precludes stop/target odds and execution-slippage inference.2. Saved2284/2208/2209 costedgap holdoutN2151 return-26.212876%,DD27.351241%,win43.979544398%,mean monthlyclusterCI[-.165928,-.052452]%,stressreturn-56.878654%; not rerun.3.Python p=.43979544398,W=.617581664%,L=.682768517% yields mean-.1108804318176%,halfKelly=max(0,.5*(p-(1-p)/(W/L)))=0. Conclusion cash187.22; positioncap212.7475 and normalaccount risk25.5297 do not force use. Validity arithmetic correct conditional on empiricalpayoffs; soundness constrained by saved vendorhistory/costmodel/selection. Regimechange is counterexample but requires independentcosted evidence. No newMonteCarlo or simulatedexitodds claimed: negativeexpectancyalreadyfailsgate. Sources22967 and saved2284; https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars .
saved return pct-26.21
saved drawdown pct27.35
win rate43.98
sample2151
mean net pct-0.11
half Kelly0
fund cash USD187.22
POST910 frozen FTK expectancy and current flow arithmetic
Python recalculation of obs22959-61, not a new backtest or independent sample. https://ir.eia.gov/wpsr/table7.csv Sep4 total11.868m b/d times7=83.076m barrels; weeklyratechange-.028 means-.196m barrels overweek. Components3.417crude/8.451products do not establish tanker tonne-miles. Census July rounded +2.3%inventory/+.1%sales implies1.023/1.001-1=2.197802% intensitygrowth; nominal survey excludingmanufacturers branches https://www.census.gov/wholesale/pdf/mwts/currentwhl.pdf . FrozenFTK1895 historical https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars N10p.30,W19.6007341/L19.2995217% gives expectancy-7.62944496% andhalfKelly-.1946214086 clipped0. Small selected sample cannot identify future distribution, but cannot support positive sizing from this rule. No simulation needed to overturn negative arithmetic.
FTK_expected_pct-7.63
raw_half_Kelly-0.19
approved_half_Kelly0
FTK_n10
total_week_m_barrels83.08
total_week_change_m-0.2
inventory_intensity_pct2.2
HITI nine-event directional coverage rejects October earnings calls and puts
HITI Oct16 K2.5 call/put close .31/.18 (Sep9); underlying2.555 throughSep10 19:20UTC. N9 issuer-dated AMC earnings: directional break-even +9.98043%/-9.19765%, coverage1/9=11.111% each (<40%); medianabs close5.494505%, medianabs gap2.34375%. Thresholds exceed close median by4.485925/3.703146pp, so no hold-through exception. Recent put .16 still1/9 at8.414873%. Intrinsic-only mean payoff .166696/.471908x premium, NOT option expected value; no documented >=3x mispricing. Premises: (1) issuer https://hightideinc.com/high-tide-to-announce-third-fiscal-quarter-2026-financial-results/ confirms Sep14 AMC; Oct16 expiry outlasts by32days. (2) Nine historical earnings AMC dates and bars recorded separately: Mar15/Jun13/Sep16 2024; Jan29/Mar17/Jun16 2025; Jan29/Mar17/Jun15 2026. Release-day close to next-session open/close, adjusted SIP daily bars. (3) A purchased direction must cover strike distance plus premium in >=40%, not merely move either way. Conclusion: neither direction qualifies. Validity holds conditional on comparable daily sessions; soundness limited by N9, price staleness, unverified minute reconstruction and Aug4 preannouncement. Counterexamples: residual option time value could permit resale profits without intrinsic coverage; changed German exposure could enlarge moves. Neither supplies a documented3x expected option payoff. Chronological six pre2026 events and three2026 holdouts: call0/6 then1/3; put1/6 then0/3. Excluded Sep15 2025 solely because AMC scheduling source was not recovered, not because of its +.8152% close response; preliminary N10 also failed1/10 each. Sample mixes quarters/business regimes. No dynamic fitting; no trade. Data /data/stock-bars?symbols=HITI&timeframe=1Day&start=2022-01-01&end=2026-09-10T19:20:00Z&feed=sip&adjustment=all; option_contracts.
Premises:1. Re-read costed vectorbt backtests2183–85: 2025training, REUSED2026Jan1-Sep9holdout,25bpfees/side10bpslippage20stress; all36hourlycells lose, supplied daily also negative. 2. Python audit observation22912 recomputes pW-(1-p)L and .5*(p-(1-p)/(W/L)); all allocations negative before clamp. 3. Sole liveBTC10 forced liquidation cannot calibrate strategy or slippage. Conclusion allocation0; this is arithmetic audit, not new experiment/backtest. Validity conditional on positiveedge gate; soundness limited by smallN, reusedwindow and historicalaggregation defects. Counterexample independent newstrategy could profit; a rally cannot validate rejected rule. Existing1.5Rtest and +1Rreferences fail current>=3R/+2Rquarter policy: newversion needs independent daily/hourly15minexecution evidence, no retuning past holdout. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/crypto-bars .
BTC_E-1.27
ETH_E-1.77
SOL_E-0.74
BTC_halfKelly-0.23
ETH_halfKelly-0.35
SOL_halfKelly-0.1
BTC_N12
ETH_N9
SOL_N8
allocation0
QTR9101940 saved holdout rejection and half-Kelly audit