Premises:1 jointly sample EEM/XLE raw split-normalized OHLC/priorclose relatives Sep2021–Dec2025 N1076;2 paired contiguous5day blocks,10000 paths,seed200906,60sessions;3 static starts67.37/64.63,stops65.48/62.10,targets74.59/77.97. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars. Compare same paths close-only vs daily low/high barriers, stop-first on ambiguous day. Close EEM stop66.89%,target17.57%,neither15.54%; OHLC71.52/17.46/11.02%. XLE close59.86/15.28/24.86%,OHLC67.88/15.12/17.00%. Both-barrier ambiguity0 in sample. Unstopped combined terminal P05/50/95=-17.24573/3.05739/23.70781 dollars. Daily extremes increase modeled stops4.63/8.02pp; they do not prove executable15minute or extended-hour exits. Omitted profit ratchet, actual quotes/spreads, gaps-through stop fills and slippage; model frequencies NOT live odds or backtest profits. Fixed one-share size remains; no Kelly from static barrier frequencies. No retest of accepted momentum edge.
paths10000
training_bars1076
EEM_close_stop_pct66.89
EEM_OHLC_stop_pct71.52
XLE_close_stop_pct59.86
XLE_OHLC_stop_pct67.88
terminal_p05-17.25
terminal_p503.06
terminal_p9523.71
06UTC 60000-path sample and block sensitivity; not live exit odds
Question: how much do static-bracket exit estimates change with sample and serial dependence? Premises:1 Current fixed basket and brackets from3645.2 Historical synchronous OHLC/priorclose ratios preserve same-day cross-sector dependence.3 Resample consecutive blocks1/5/20days separately from1152 pre2026 and179 recent2026 sessions,10000 paths per case,60 sessions,seed92006,86.66 each,6bp/side assumed friction. No fitted parameter selected. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars. Method stop first for ambiguous same-day dual touch; gap stop at worse opening price; target at fixed target; remaining mark at60-day close. Static current brackets; stop first on same-day dual touch; opening gap stop at worse open; no ratchet, monthly rerank or 15min checks; adjusted OHLC not executable prices; chosen current basket selection bias; 6bp per side costs assumed; no calibrated odds or Kelly sizing. Full case figures observations30444–49. Pre2026 target frequencies XLK12.96–17.29%,XLE11.17–15.56%,XLV13.94–16.61%;2026 XLK20.60–26.17%,XLE32.97–39.15%,XLV20.50–23.43%. Basket loss frequency48.39–50.20% versus19.76–22.72%; modeled mean dollar PnL2.796–3.655 versus9.291–9.632. P05 dollar outcomes roughly-9.89 to-8.97 do NOT bound loss. Conclusion sample choice materially dominates implied success odds, so no empirical Kelly input or sizing/target override. Ratchets/monthly replacement and15minute monitoring omitted deliberately to isolate model sensitivity; not execution backtest, not validated premium test, and not live probabilities. Counterexample crisis correlations and gaps outside observed sample defeat benign recent results. Source was already observed;2026 is a comparison segment, not independent OOS.
Premises:1 common-date adjusted gaps training2021–2024 N1004;2 synchronized5-session blocks preserve cross-asset shocks and short serial dependence;3 20000 paths20sessions, seed92006;4 fixed93.33 notionals each. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars?feed=sip&adjustment=all . Simulated maximum single-night basket loss Q50/95/99=3.913011/7.974398/14.828643USD; zero sampled paths exceed30. This zero is bounded empirical support, NOT zero real tail risk, a portfolio loss limit or live exit probability. Excludes intraday paths, trading costs, stop-through gaps, changing notionals and unseen shocks; no Kelly inferred. EEM holdout threshold exceeds nominal1% frequency (3644), directly challenging stationary extrapolation. Retain separately the stop-through-gap scenario r=2ATR/E,c=r+(1-r)*2g+.005,g=.125794155019/.109666233203/.138906519177; size=floorcents min(280/3,250,29.5/c). Results [{"symbol":"EEM","size":93.33,"stop":65.1435,"target":74.21425092953517,"p90":0.10717963493264468,"rr":3.8082432703605487,"stress":25.913232637416957},{"symbol":"QQQ","size":93.33,"stop":704.90264,"target":838.105473380901,"p90":0.1616958533244174,"rr":7.049793645687354,"stress":22.608077650841185},{"symbol":"IWM","size":93.33,"stop":277.666,"target":320.5246054777956,"p90":0.12821050854556687,"rr":5.661269113738809,"stress":27.921384363225883}]. Joint76.442695USD; modeled per-lot<30 but shocks outside assumptions can exceed3% equity. No increase in size from benign bootstrap quantiles.
paths20000
block_days5
horizon_days20
seed92006
q50_loss3.91
q95_loss7.97
q99_loss14.83
sampled_above300
retained_joint_stress76.44
R92004 Acetyl candidate exit sensitivity: 80000 paths, no calibrated edge
Premises:1 SIP raw/all paired daily bars split-normalized, source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars ;2 1255returns endingSep18,paired5session blocks,seed200904,10000paths each,60sessions;3 common sampled blocks start67.37/64.63 and dailyclose barriers65.48/74.59 and62.10/77.97. {"total_proxy":{"n":1255,"exit_frequencies":{"EEM":{"stop_first":0.6264,"target_first":0.2315,"neither":0.1421},"XLE":{"stop_first":0.5419,"target_first":0.178,"neither":0.2801}},"unstopped_terminal_p05_p50_p95":[-13.692639696010037,5.5778139751457445,25.07779318050785]},"price_only":{"n":1255,"exit_frequencies":{"EEM":{"stop_first":0.6462,"target_first":0.2176,"neither":0.1362},"XLE":{"stop_first":0.5616,"target_first":0.1642,"neither":0.2742}},"unstopped_terminal_p05_p50_p95":[-14.488618360514453,4.665241971145377,24.212728061139096]}} Conclusion: total-return proxy target frequencies exceed price-only by1.39pp EEM/1.38pp XLE; neither equals actual execution odds. Price-only excludes dividend cash wealth, total-return proxy reinvests payouts as price and therefore mismatches price barriers. Both omit live gaps/slippage,15min checks,profit ratchets,costs and regime change. Not a strategy backtest or calibrated Kelly input. Keep one share; do not select a favorable convention to justify doubling.
paths_each10000
sessions60
blocks5
sample1255
EEM_target_total_pct23.15
EEM_target_price_pct21.76
XLE_target_total_pct17.8
XLE_target_price_pct16.42
Deterministic stop-through-gap scenario retained after adjustment audit
Premises:1 current reference entries/ATR from3607;2 carried gap assumptions g EEM.125794155019 QQQ.109666233203 IWM.138906519177, not fresh tail estimates;3 cash1000/fund280/position250. r=2ATR/E; coefficient=r+(1-r)*2g+.005; size=floorcents min(280/3,250,29.5/coefficient). Gives93.33each. Stress EEM25.913233 QQQ22.608078 IWM27.921384 joint76.442695USD, each<30 under modeled shocks. Larger shocks can exceed3%; no guaranteed bound or calibrated odds. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars . Prior unchanged-sample Monte Carlo3570 retained, not rerun as new evidence. Actual payout/stop slippage and distribution timing unknown. No trade-derived Kelly from empty reset ledger; equal-weight mandate governs.
size93.33
EEM_stress25.91
QQQ_stress22.61
IWM_stress27.92
joint_stress76.44
account_equity1000
R92002 160000 bootstrap paths test bracket sensitivity, not bottleneck value
Premises:1.Joint daily OHLC/previousclose ratios from https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars ; NumPy seed92002,5day blocks,20000paths per stock/window, all operating history and last252,60sessions. 2.Fixed research brackets E/S/T:CE45.41/42.027/56.2870;IMOS61.30/56.99918/75.1852;BTDR12.97/11.11183/18.75245;AMTX2.16/1.90454/2.96101. Targets solve NET3R at5bp fee+15bp slippage per side; they are hurdles NOT valuations. Stops first if both crossed; opening gaps worse; target capped; terminalclose. 3.All/recent mean return% CE .682/.107,IMOS1.156/4.594,BTDR4.464/2.013,AMTX.208/.303. Target probability% CE18.835/24.115,IMOS23.395/41.35,BTDR32.685/28.455,AMTX25.695/26.195. Stop%61.945–73.9 across cells. Conclusion: hypothetical tails can pay frequent losses but unconditional resampling cannot calibrate conditional breakout profitability, operating change or fairvalue. Actual rule holdouts3590etc are separate. HalfKelly capital-grid results (.03–.5) constrained0..1, not unconstrained optimum or authorization. IMOS one-share50%gap costs30.834 incl friction, above normal30 account-risk budget; fractional/quarterprobe only if evidence qualifies, which it does not.160000total paths, not60000; observation metric typo clarified.
Premises:1 paired adjusted daily returns from https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars throughSep18; confirmed split repair.2 numpy seed200902,10000 paths each,60sessions,paired contiguous5day blocks sampled uniformly within fiveyear and recent252 windows.3 begin67.37/64.63; first daily close crossing initial65.48/74.59 and62.10/77.97. Results {"five_year":{"sample":1255,"terminal_unstopped_p05_p50_p95":[-13.916517520707718,5.8303433744541735,25.288007680026965],"EEM":{"stop_first":0.6241,"target_first":0.237,"neither":0.1389},"XLE":{"stop_first":0.5393,"target_first":0.186,"neither":0.2747}},"last252":{"sample":252,"terminal_unstopped_p05_p50_p95":[-3.2249203133477518,11.295509565202536,26.156546836256823],"EEM":{"stop_first":0.5802,"target_first":0.3565,"neither":0.0633},"XLE":{"stop_first":0.3986,"target_first":0.2382,"neither":0.3632}}}. Recent-window terminal5% loss -3.22 vs fiveyear-13.92 exposes sample dependence; endpoint returns are UNSTOPPED dollar changes, not actual strategy PnL. Frequencies omit intraday paths, execution gaps, fees, profit ratchets and changing regimes; not calibrated live probabilities or Kelly inputs. This is risk sensitivity, not revalidation/backtest of the accepted momentum premium. Keep1share per slot; no size changes from favorable recent window.
paths_each10000
sessions60
block5
fiveyear_n1255
recent_n252
fiveyear_p05-13.92
recent_p05-3.22
fiveyear_EEM_target_pct23.7
recent_EEM_target_pct35.65
Retained stop-through-gap sizing and reproducibility diagnostic
Premises:1 initial93.33each;2 r=2ATR/entry;3 retained g assumptions EEM.125794155019 QQQ.109666233203 IWM.138906519177 from prior fund stress, not new guaranteed bounds. Size=floorcents min(280/3,250,29.5/(r+(1-r)*2g+.005)) gives93.33each. Stress=N*(r+(1-r)*2g+.005): EEM25.913233,QQQ22.608078,IWM27.921384, joint76.442695. Each modeled loss<30 account3%; larger gaps can exceed this. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars?feed=sip&adjustment=all. Separate seed92002 jointIID20000x20day closing-return paths last1260 observations: P05 -22.652306,median2.100807,P9528.781054 dollars. Repeated unchanged-sample diagnostic is NOT new evidence. No costs/stops/targets/intraday sequence/serial dependence; current basket retrospectively selected. Neither live exit odds nor Kelly estimate; no sizing change.
per_lot93.33
max_stress27.92
joint_stress76.44
paths20000
days20
p05-22.65
median2.1
p9528.78
R92000 80000 paths test exits, not intrinsic value or live probabilities
Premises: S46.67 K37.5 paid.23, indicativeIV55.94%, N11 empirical signed reactions3554. NumPy50k paths/scenario, seed92000,20businesssteps Sep21–Oct16, eventstep12 Oct6; zero-drift GBM26/40/60% ordinaryvol, empiricalevent replaces dailyreturn. BSM put floored intrinsic,4% rate assumption, preIV55.94%,postIVscenario; initialmodel.23647 vsask.23. Daily stop.115,target.69, exit .01/share friction plus1USD roundtripfee. Hypothetical hold-through means+3.27/+8.81/+7.67USD, targets4.83/11.78/22.62%,but current20.14% hurdle exceeds10.02%median so this hold policy is outside mandate. Mandate-consistent forced Oct5 day11 exit means-13.81/-9.02/+.88USD, targets.556/7.006/20.698%. These uncalibrated daily marks omit American/dividend details and15-minute quote/liquidity risk. Full-premium loss remains possible despite half-premium stop. Separate empiricalterminalintrinsic after.02 friction:2/11wins, meanintrinsic.650308, grid halfKelly6.704% equity; it omits timevalue/path and uses same observed tails, so not live odds. It cannot override failedgate; actualsize0, future onepremium<=30,total100,max4. Crucial counterexample: higher price of a nearerstrike may passmedian when cheapenough; reprice rather than claim modelprofits at an impermissible hold. Sources https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/option-chain/LW?feed=indicative ; stockbars and issuerOct6date29824.
paths50000
event_step12
premium23
initial_model0.24
hold_mean_vol263.27
preexit_mean_vol26-13.81
preexit_mean_vol40-9.02
preexit_mean_vol600.88
intrinsic_halfKelly_pct6.7
empirical_win_pct18.18
live_size0
Weekend conditional 20-session paths and retained gap stress
Premises:1 same-day joint rows of last1260returns preserve cross-asset dependence;2 numpy seed920,20000paths of20 IID sessions;3 constant initial93.33 each and compounded closes. P05 -22.5286USD,median2.0020,P9528.8353. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars?feed=sip&adjustment=all. This repeat is a reproducibility diagnostic of new retrieval, not fresh independent evidence; prior3463 already established dependence. No stops/targets/intraday exits/costs/serial dependence; 2020crisis omitted, retrospectively selected basket, no calibrated trade odds or Kelly input. Separate retained scenario r=2ATR/entry; stress=N*(r+(1-r)*2g+.005), g EEM.125794155019 QQQ.109666233203 IWM.138906519177 from prior record, not remeasured extrema. EEM25.9132 QQQ22.6081 IWM27.9214,joint76.4427USD. Size=floorcents min(280/3,250,29.5/(r+(1-r)*2g+.005)) yields93.33 each. Every lot below30 in this stated scenario, but complete loss93.33 could exceed3% account; empirical envelopes cannot guarantee maximum overnight loss. No inferred safe bound or size uplift.
Premises:1 source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars?feed=sip&adjustment=all paired adjusted close returns last1255observations.2 numpy seed190908,10000paths,60sessions,12 independent uniform5day block starts preserving cross-asset pairing, compound from queued limits.3 fixed horizontal initial brackets; first close crossing recorded, no intraday prices, gaps, costs, ratchets or live execution. Results {"seed":190908,"paths":10000,"days":60,"block":5,"sample":1255,"terminal_p05_dollars":-13.725602935665727,"terminal_median_dollars":6.065331103171697,"terminal_p95_dollars":25.972824647228244,"EEM":{"stop_first":0.6226,"target_first":0.2373,"neither":0.1401},"XLE":{"stop_first":0.5383,"target_first":0.1841,"neither":0.2776}}. Terminal dollar quantiles are UNSTOPPED mark-to-market, not stopped strategyPnL. Counterexample regime shifts or overnight gaps invalidate stationary sampling. Model crossing frequencies are not calibrated live odds; no new sizing/strategy/backtest or Kelly inferred. One share maintained.
Premises:1 source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars?timeframe=1Day&feed=sip&adjustment=all&start=2020-09-01&end=2026-09-18T23:59:59Z verifiedsplitrepair29429,1255 rolling60session gains each.2 numpy seed190906;3000replicates for each blocklength20/60/120,uniformvalidblockstarts,concatenateandtrim1255;sample already-computed gains,notpricepaths.3 blockdependence betterpreserved thanIID butstationarity assumed. Percentile2.5–97.5 ranges inpercent: EEM block20[8.4246,14.6764],60[7.7705,15.2419],120[7.2695,14.6641];XLE20[16.7909,24.9857],60[14.2856,26.7455],120[13.1971,27.1555]. MediansrespectivelyEEM10.7581/10.8267/10.6242,XLE20.5145/20.4653/20.5145. These are conditional resampling uncertainty bands for the historical estimator, NOT future-return ranges, stop/target probabilities, or portfolioPnL. No fees/fills modeled because no execution claim. Counterexample structuralbreak defeatsbootstrap; periods demonstrate instability. Conclusion sizing unchanged1each and acceptedqueues preserved; no empiricalKelly inferred. Existing4.42 plannedrisk isnotlossbound. This is distinct from priorgap-path diagnostic, not a repeatedstrategybacktest.
seed190906
replicates_per_case3000
cases6
EEM_60block_low_pct7.77
EEM_60block_high_pct15.24
XLE_60block_low_pct14.29
XLE_60block_high_pct26.75
Intraday-barrier and regime assumptions materially change modeled exit odds
Premises:1) SIP normalized OHLC throughSep18 https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars; current selected basket, no past selection simulation.2) 10000 synchronized63-session paths per regime with circular5-day blocks, seed91906,1255 fullsample days or179 recent2026days; preserve within-day cross-sector/within-block dependence. Each OHLC divided by its previous close, compound from1.3) Fixed current2ATR stop and5yearP90 targets,86.66each; no trail, SMA ratchet, reranking or re-entry. This is sensitivity study, NOT mandate backtest, OOS validation or calibrated live odds. Close model tests at close and fills there; OHLC tests low/high, gaps fill at open if beyond barrier, otherwise barrier; stop first for ambiguous day (zero encountered). Survivors liquidated at day63close. Costs6bp eachway baseline,20bp stress; no cash interest. Fullsample close mean6.0981USD,median4.6280,P5−12.8331,P9534.6646,loss39.60%; OHLC mean4.5986,median2.6125,P5−9.8123,P9531.2103,loss43.64%. Full OHLC stop odds69.40/63.51/66.99%,target18.58/18.68/17.52%,survive12.02/17.81/15.49. Recent close mean12.8759,loss14.28%; recentOHLCmean10.4871,loss18.54%; recentOHLCstop66.53/43.15/64.44%,target26.13/36.75/22.39%,survive7.34/20.10/13.17. Stresscostmeans fullclose5.3541/fullOHLC3.8588/recentclose12.1130/recentOHLC9.7309. Full outputs observations recorded separately. No sampled lot loss>20; this DOES NOT bound unseen gaps. Intraday model assumes barrier liquidity and continuous observation, unlike venue15min checks; adjustment prices not executable quotes. Trailing rules omitted, no directional claim about their effect. Historical regimes retain drift; small recent sample exaggerates precision. Conclusion unchanged86.66 slots; never equate historical P90 with90%hit probability. Model sensitivity explains uncertainty; no strategy retest per specific mandate.
Premises:1 1255 synchronized daily returns Sep20 2021–Sep18 2026;2 fixed today's EEM/QQQ/IWM93.33 initial dollars each, buy-and-hold compounding20sessions;3 numpy20000paths seed91906;4 compare joint IID rows with independent perasset IID rows, then joint5sessionblocks for serial sensitivity. Same-day dependence isolation: P05 PnL -22.4160 versus -13.4391 USD, ES05 -28.6110 versus -17.1955; model probability loss>30 1.505% versus .015%. Joint5dayblock P05 -21.6557,ES05 -28.4310,P01 -32.7992,lossfrequency42.17%,loss>30 1.58%. Full results {"N":20000,"H":20,"block":5,"sample":1255,"start":"2021-09-20","end":"2026-09-18","seed":91906,"joint_block":{"p01":-32.79919741904743,"p05":-21.655714707388654,"median":2.909658317689602,"mean":2.714465051489629,"prob_loss":0.4217,"prob_loss30":0.0158,"es05":-28.431048746217193},"joint_iid":{"p01":-32.76254907968935,"p05":-22.41602014010171,"median":1.9648147526769801,"mean":2.5320445311655244,"prob_loss":0.44905,"prob_loss30":0.01505,"es05":-28.61101950104886},"independent_iid":{"p01":-19.57023865210427,"p05":-13.439106213579274,"median":2.5778309022182273,"mean":2.6777364221379094,"prob_loss":0.39825,"prob_loss30":0.00015,"es05":-17.1955094610215},"correlation":{"EEM":{"EEM":1,"QQQ":0.6929633476476149,"IWM":0.6507916837227055},"QQQ":{"EEM":0.6929633476476149,"QQQ":1,"IWM":0.7785802945417117},"IWM":{"EEM":0.6507916837227055,"QQQ":0.7785802945417117,"IWM":1}}}. Validity: dependence alters basket distribution; soundness limited to empirical stationary return model. Today's basket retrospectivelyselected, 2020excluded, no execution/stops/targets/ratchets/costs, no held-out strategy or actual winrate. These probabilities are conditional model frequencies, NOT calibrated forecasts, exit odds or Kelly inputs. No size uplift or momentum veto. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars?feed=sip&adjustment=all
Premises: historical10overnight gaps from observations29367–76, Sep18 S2.84, Oct16putK2.5. 30,000NumPy paths/volscenario seed91904, Monday-entry-to-expiry19trading steps; sample one historical GAP atstep3 then diffuse daily; use gaps rather than nextdayclose move to avoid adding intradayreaction twice. Vol scenarios40/60/80% annualized; zero stock drift, risk-free4% assumption; preevent option IV108.28% from indicativequote, posteventIV=scenario realizedvol. BSM put floored atintrinsic approximates American mark; no verified optimal exercise surface. Exit at daily observed model mark below0.5premium or above P80target.552156, else horizon. Gaps may pass stop; exitprice not stopguarantee. Fees1USDroundtrip and.01/shareexitslippage. At premium.13 mean dollarPnL -5.2523/-2.5318/+1.1347, stop80.4167/77.89/73.8533%, target7.2333/11.8667/17.7267%, win17.9433/20.62/24.9133%. At.28 allnegative(-18.5996,-16.2792,-13.7725); already failsmandate. At.11 means-3.2232/-.5282/+3.1574. These are assumption sensitivity, NOT calibrated venue execution probabilities: historicalsample10, resamplingIID,mixedregimes,indicativeIV,daily not15min marks, modeledliquidity. P05 loss .13case14USD includingfees; premium stillwhole13USD risk, not6.50stop. Separate empirical intrinsic-only Kelly grid on10signed nextdayclose moves: at.10 meanpayoff.116659,profit30%,halfKelly1.77%account; at.11 halfKelly.70%account; at.13/.28 halfKelly0. Intrinsic-only excludes remainingtimevalue; friction lowersKelly further. It does NOT prove no positive optionexpectancy at.13, but cannot support a confident size. One .11contract costs11USD vs7USD intrinsic halfKelly =>granularity matters. Start100fundcash/1000account, hardpremium30/lot,total100,max4. No live size; a future cheap probe requires honestly stated netodds/size under currentcapital andprice. Data sources https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars and https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/option-chain/SFIX?feed=indicative .
sample_paths30000
events10
spot2.84
assumed_premium0.13
target0.55
mean_pnl_vol40-5.25
mean_pnl_vol60-2.53
mean_pnl_vol801.13
target_pct_vol6011.87
stop_pct_vol6077.89
halfKelly_at_10_pct1.77
halfKelly_at_13_pct0
R91904 regime-dependent path simulation informs risk, not an automatic cash veto or buy
NumPy seed91904,20,000 paths/model,60sessions,five-day blocks of jointOHLC/priorclose ratios. Two source pools:2016–23 training2011returns and latest252sessions. E14.82/S12.672/T21.919686,55bp each side; gap stops at worse open, target capped, same-bar stop first, timeouts marked at60. Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars . Training/recent modeled target rates14.305/34.13%,stop56.01/65.075%,mean netreturn+.2761/+5.5309%,median both-15.4293%. Mean wins26.8199/45.7187%,mean losses14.7034/15.8906%,profit rates36.075/34.77%. Binary half-Kelly risk-stake approximations.5148%/6.0489% of bankroll; not direct position notional and not validated live edge. Sampling recent AI regime nearly triples target frequency but also raises stop frequency; don't select the pool to justify an order. Daily path model misses monitoring delays, future jumps and conditional fundamental information; simulated maximum loss is not a bound. Four shares59.28 imply planned netstoprisk9.197 and assumed50%gap loss29.64 plus costs, below3%account only approximately; use3 shares if reserving explicit friction under30. Quarter-probe of a feasible4-share ceiling would be1share14.82, stoprisk2.30 and50%gap7.41. All actual sizes0 because current entry/defended payoff remain unqualified, not because an arbitrary tail threshold vetoes risk. If qualified later, recompute half-Kelly with appropriate evidence and current cap; don't transfer these unconditional odds.