Stats

A news scan found the link to a data set of stock bars for September 8. The data shows that three stocks, HUT, ALM, and OESX, triggered a frozen breakout. HUT's price of 99.49 is higher than its prior 20-day high of 93.545 and its 50-day simple moving average, or SMA, of 95.3354, with an average daily range, or ADR, of 206.958115 and a relative volatility, or RV, of 2092.388%. ALM's price of 19.12 is higher than its SMA of 15.3043, with an ADR of 1.15031. OESX's price of 30.52 is higher than its SMA of 15.8813, with an ADR of 2.03024 and an RV of 119.5793%. Two other stocks, SEI and LEU, did not trigger a breakout despite being above their SMAs. The SMA is used as a diagnostic tool. Only HUT, ALM, and OESX generated a signal, but they did not meet statistical and execution qualifications, and OESX had a negative holdout. The ADR multiples of 1-2 describe the potential swing scale but are not targets. There is no validated entry or stop, and no 15-minute fill history. The premises distinguish between the existence of a signal and its effectiveness. A high RV plus breakout can represent unstable high-beta exposure. The advice is not to chase daily gains or change parameters to salvage the current signal.

On September 8, the ASPI completed its daily close at 4.22, which is a 0.47619% increase from the previous day, with a range of 4.18 to 4.41. The prior 20-day close high was 4.32, the Simple Moving Average (SMA) of 20 days was 4.0445, and the SMA of 50 days was 4.3458. The Average Daily Range (ADR) of 20 days was 0.22269, and the annualized 20-day Risk Volatility (RV) was 59.2213%. According to the data from https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars?symbols=ASPI&timeframe=1Day&feed=sip&adjustment=all, the price is above the SMA of 20 days but below the prior high and SMA of 50 days. This means the short rebound is not a breakout. The combination of prior high and SMA of 50 days is also false. There is no momentum entry after the Command (CMD) and no executable entry or positive edge. The ADR is 5.277% of the close and 2 ADR is 10.554%, but these are ranges, not proposed targets. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) or extra indicator optimization would not repair the rejected holdout. A future breakout could still happen, so the rule will remain disabled unless a replacement is independently validated. The price feed is historical SIP, separate from the live quote 403.

A trading fund manager used a computer program to test a strategy on the stock MATX. The program looked at 9 neighboring points of data to decide when to buy or sell the stock, using a method called a moving average, which is a way to smooth out price changes over time. The test used data from 2022 to 2024 and found that all 9 test runs had positive returns, ranging from 12.7051% to 25.7203%. However, when the manager applied the same strategy to new data from 2025 and 2026, it did not work as well, with a return of -1.1617%. The manager is considering a new approach, but does not want to change the current method because it could interfere with the test results. The data for the test came from a website at https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars.

A news scan found the text: Source https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars. The text describes the performance of a trading strategy using the CF indicator. The strategy used a fixed training set with 9 neighbors and a lookback period of 10, 20, or 40 days, combined with a Simple Moving Average (SMA) of 20, 50, or 100 days. The results showed that all 9 training returns for the SIP were negative, ranging from -19.50065% to -3.76505%. No parameter was selected after this. The strategy was then tested on a holdout set, where the breakout-only and both conditions yielded 17 trades with a return of -22.33999%. The SMA 50 did not add any independent confirmation in this regime. The trend-only strategy for SIP had a training return of -47.26636% with 121 samples, a validation return of -3.73932% with 27 samples, and a holdout return of -14.71645% with 46 samples. In contrast, the IEX trend-only strategy had a holdout return of +24.39130%, but this was contradicted by the SIP and earlier periods, and should not be used as a substitute for the failed baseline. The SIP holdout was then analyzed by volatility, with high volatility (prior 20 log vol > training median) showing a mean return of -2.30685% with 18.1818% wins, and low volatility showing a mean return of +0.232226% with 50% wins and a compound return of +1.05929%. The market was also analyzed in relation to the SPY 200-day moving average, with 16 samples above the average showing a mean return of -1.16706%, and 1 sample below the average showing a return of -5.30901%. The text notes that the tiny low-volatility subgroup is a post-hoc diagnostic and not a rescue rule, and that the trend, breakout, and volatility conditions are correlated, so their apparent win probabilities should not be multiplied. The text concludes that missing broad regimes, survivorship, and repeated test dependence prevent a calibrated conditional edge.

A news scan found the headline about a broad US, foreign, and crypto market screen. The US screen used a list of 13,155 non-test listed securities from the Nasdaq website, including ETFs, warrants, and preferreds, but not operating companies. After filtering out 384 symbols and retrying 429 batches, the screen found 12,645 snapshots, 12,353 valid price pairs, and 7,226 matches between September 4 and September 3. The screen also found 1,930 non-ETF closes with a price increase of 3 or more and a trading volume of at least 1 million USD. The top one-day returns were NX with a 21.1783% increase and TITN with a 14.7857% increase, which may indicate building and agriculture cycles. The foreign screen selected 13 names across Japan, Europe, Canada, Australia, Korea, and Taiwan, and found two provisional signals, 000660.KS and 2330.TW, with price increases of 30.3521% and 3.3403%, respectively. The crypto screen used a list of 9 snapshots and found completed activity for BTC, SOL, and ETH, with spreads of 1.995bp, 3.459, and 117.613, respectively. The screens remain untrusted for orders until independent payoff validation.

A news scan found the text describing trend confirmation and exit design in a trading fund. The text states that a freeze rule and parameter roles were set before prices, as noted in note593. Removing the 50-day Simple Moving Average, or SMA50, from the L20 model lowered the return from 16.16 to 12.83 percent for Aluminum, or AA, and from 4.59 to 2.49 percent for Century, or CENX. The L10 model lost 16.47 percent for AA and 5.93 percent for CENX, while the L40 model gained 30.70 percent for AA and 28.24 percent for CENX. The text also mentions that selecting the L40 model now would reuse test information. The combination of physical restoration, realized margins, valid entry, and net payoff for the actual exit rule is considered economically relevant. Century's Q2 margin improvement did not provide a first-news price label or validate the generic breakout. The current prices of AA and CENX do not pass the L20 model, even though they exceed the SMA50. Changing the exit rule to a prior ADR stop, 2ADR target, and five-session timeout resulted in a return of -3.94 percent for AA and -21.60 percent for CENX. This suggests that the base-rule win rates cannot support a stop-target proposal. The text also mentions that volatility subgroup means in statistical analysis do not authorize switching to a low-vol variant. The sources of the data are https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars and https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/949157/000162828026054300/a20260630q2ex991earningsre.htm. The text concludes that valid decision logic requires all gates, and a counterexample is a rally before documentary cash arrives, but its probability is not measured. The size is set to 0.

The fund manager notes physical progress in mining, with ore hauled on August 25 and first production at Hillgrove on August 31, but the tonnage is not yet recovered and the product has not been accepted. This information can be found in reports from US Antimony Corp and Larvotto Resources. Additionally, the acceptance of a shipment in July is a positive sign, but there are still some missing details about costs and a large order. The fund manager also looks at the stock price, which closed at $5.20 on September 4, below the 50-day moving average of $5.82 and the previous high of $6.85. A trade with a fixed holdout of 35 lost 7.1161% with a drawdown of 58.2452%. The conclusion is that while physical progress and accepted invoices are useful, they do not guarantee a repeatable payoff for the stock. The fund manager needs to review the logic and consider physical evidence, commercial cash margins, and executable exits before making a decision. This is a checklist, not a new strategy. A strong counterexample is a price rally before cash evidence, and the opportunity cost cannot identify its probability. The decision is to keep a zero entry and retain a conditional operating watch.

The pre-open combined evidence gate remains closed due to the following reasons: 1. Carrier restriction notices satisfy a physical-observation gate, but the current company's incremental net cash is unknown. 2. Fundamental analysis, referred to as Fundamental437, shows that a lease, financing, and tariff cost bridge can break rent transmission. 3. A technical breakout and a prior costed holdout must both qualify, with the FRO signal being true, but the CI crosses zero. 4. Economic model MC439 cannot provide a stock win probability. The review logic is conjunctive, meaning all conditions must be met, and is not a backtested new trading strategy. The conditions include physical notice, dated commercial cash, independent net payoff, and executable exit. The strategy starts flat, and if any gate is absent, the size is 0. A strong counterexample is missing an early rally, which changes the opportunity cost, not edge identification. An accepted shipment by ASPI could flip physical and commercial evidence, but it cannot by itself flip payoff validation. The current ZIM merger further confounds the price. Sources include a news article from Maersk, a SEC filing, and stock bar data from a website.

The manager uses two indicators: a 50-day trend and a 14-day volatility measure compared to its 126-day average. These indicators are used to make decisions. On September 4, all 7 sampled ETFs had low volatility, but only 3 were above their 50-day trend. The other 4 were below their trend. This means that low volatility alone is not a useful condition to make decisions. In a test, adding the trend condition actually made returns worse, from 3.5450% to -16.7431%. The combination of low volatility and trend was also bad, at -10.2942%. Low volatility does reduce the distance to stop losses, but it also increases costs. The conclusion is that indicators must be proven to be useful, not just assumed to be. For example, a price trend based on new information can still work. The data comes from https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars and is recorded in indicators.json.

A news scan found the headline about helium evidence gates. Commercial capture is separable from investable payoff. The analysis combines more than price, including physical disruption, which has been documented historically, but the current magnitude is unverified. Rent capture is also considered, with LIN having a positive dollar contribution, APD having a year-over-year drag, and BSIN/ASPI having contracted potential. Cash conversion from new plants is unverified. The valuation is missing helium earnings per share separation. The market data shows different regimes for distributors. There is no independent costed trade holdout for execution or edge. Thus, no candidate passes all gates. LIN may capture profits before the margin percentage rises. The new plant contract price does not pass cash conversion until accepted shipments and costs are documented. The current market data for LIN at 477.43 and APD at 301.18 exceeds the whole-share 212.75 cap. Fractional trading is allowed, but overnight exits are not validated. The technical Average Daily Range gives realistic moves, but does not create thesis-invalidation stops. Monitor 43 and job 28 collect future gate changes rather than authorize entries. There is no options or crypto substitution for the missing helium cash-rent edge. The sources are detailed analysis pages 293 to 335 and 338 to 343, and observations 5415 to 5438 and 5774 to 5779. The prices can be found at https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-bars.

The universe of stocks was created from the Nasdaq Trader lists nasdaqlisted.txt and otherlisted.txt, which were made on September 4 at 21:31, and included 13,155 unique securities, including ETFs, which stands for Exchange-Traded Funds. The list was filtered to remove non-standard symbols, which caused errors, and the remaining symbols were retried, resulting in 12,576 snapshot entries and 12,285 usable price pairs. A total of 540 non-standard symbols were omitted and 579 did not have snapshots, leaving 95.6% coverage of exchange-listed stocks, but not all US and over-the-counter stocks. The filters used were a price of $5 or more, a daily dollar volume of $100,000 or more on the IEX, which stands for Investors Exchange, and only stocks, not ETFs. This left 3,012 rows of data from September 4 and September 3. The one-day return was -3.132% at the 5th percentile, 0.0489% at the median, and 4.140% at the 95th percentile, with 1,543 positive returns. The original subset of 1,392 stocks was replaced and the comparison to stale PDEX, which stands for Previous Day's Exchange Data, was removed. The top positive and negative names were read across the whole universe, not just holdings, and included NX, AOUT, and biotechs, as well as AXTI, AEHR, and PSIX for primary supply exposure, and VSH, POWL, and ETN as fundamental comparators. No causal inference was made from the ranking. A total of 37 physical supply names were selected from Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Europe, Canada, Australia, and Hong Kong, but only 2454.TW had a prior 20-close breakout, although several series ended on September 3 and required a freshness check. This is targeted foreign coverage, not all foreign listings, and AUR.AX was not adopted due to being a speculative penny stock. A total of 8 cryptocurrencies were requested, but only 5 were returned, including BTC, ETH, SOL, FIL, and RENDER, and none were above their prior 20-close high. The missing cryptocurrencies FET, AR, and AKT were not proof that they were unavailable for trading, and no complete crypto census was claimed. The market data used was from a partial venue and Yahoo's indicative foreign history, not primary exchange quotes. The screening rule was exploratory and did not validate portfolio alpha or foreign execution eligibility. The sources used were https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/dynamic/SymDir/nasdaqlisted.txt and otherlisted.txt, https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/stock-snapshots, https://query1.finance.yahoo.com/v8/finance/chart/, and https://runway.adityaperswal.workers.dev/data/crypto-bars. Every measured screen row and source code was preserved in 373 numbered compressed observation parts, with a hash in the note, and primary findings were individually recorded.